Title
Participatory methods for planning the future in forest communities
Date Issued
01 July 2010
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Evans K.
de Jong W.
Nghi T.H.
Center for International Forestry
Abstract
Forest devolution and government decentralization have increased community control over forests. Remoteness, low literacy, and lack of formal planning experience often leave forest communities unprepared for their new responsibilities. Forest communities need to develop skills that allow them to establish goals and make decisions transparently and democratically and to negotiate effectively with other local actors if they are to become more proactive participants in local governance processes. In Bolivia and Vietnam we tested four adaptations of scenario-based methods to assist forest communities to develop these skills. This article reflects on the strengths, limitations, and new applications of these methods. The methods encourage participation by members who have little experience with structured planning, including the most marginalized: women, elderly, and illiterate participants. The methods are useful as planning tools, for generating records of decision-making processes, and for preparing for negotiations between communities and local governments. © 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Start page
604
End page
619
Volume
23
Issue
7
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Forestal
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-77953463320
Source
Society and Natural Resources
ISSN of the container
08941920
Source funding
Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit
Sponsor(s)
The research leading to this article was financially supported by SDC (Switzerland) and BMZ (Germany). We are grateful to Tropenbos and Helvetas Vietnam for support for the fieldwork. We also thank many government officials in Bolivia and Vietnam for their help. Mostly we thank the people of San Roque, Turi Carretera, Thuong Nhat Village 1, and Khe Tran for sharing their time, hopes, and dreams with us. Lastly, we thank Eva Wollenberg and three anonymous reviewers for providing constructive feedback on drafts of the article.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus