Title
Total evidence and sensitivity phylogenetic analyses of egg-brooding frogs (Anura: Hemiphractidae)
Date Issued
01 August 2021
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
De la Riva I.
Rojas-Runjaic F.J.M.
R. Dias I.
Castroviejo-Fisher S.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
Publisher(s)
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Abstract
We study the phylogenetic relationships of egg-brooding frogs, a group of 118 neotropical species, unique among anurans by having embryos with large bell-shaped gills and females carrying their eggs on the dorsum, exposed or inside a pouch. We assembled a total evidence dataset of published and newly generated data containing 51 phenotypic characters and DNA sequences of 20 loci for 143 hemiphractids and 127 outgroup terminals. We performed six analytical strategies combining different optimality criteria (parsimony and maximum likelihood), alignment methods (tree- and similarity-alignment), and three different indel coding schemes (fifth character state, unknown nucleotide, and presence/absence characters matrix). Furthermore, we analyzed a subset of the total evidence dataset to evaluate the impact of phenotypic characters on hemiphractid phylogenetic relationships. Our main results include: (i) monophyly of Hemiphractidae and its six genera for all our analyses, novel relationships among hemiphractid genera, and non-monophyly of Hemiphractinae according to our preferred phylogenetic hypothesis; (ii) non-monophyly of current supraspecific taxonomies of Gastrotheca, an updated taxonomy is provided; (iii) previous differences among studies were mainly caused by differences in analytical factors, not by differences in character/taxon sampling; (iv) optimality criteria, alignment method, and indel coding caused differences among optimal topologies, in that order of degree; (v) in most cases, parsimony analyses are more sensitive to the addition of phenotypic data than maximum likelihood analyses; (vi) adding phenotypic data resulted in an increase of shared clades for most analyses.
Start page
375
End page
401
Volume
37
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ciencia veterinaria
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85097605658
PubMed ID
Source
Cladistics
ISSN of the container
07483007
Sponsor(s)
We are grateful to Juan Carlos Chaparro (MUBI), Mirco Solé, Victor Dill Orrico, Caio Vinicius De Mira‐Mendes (UESC), and Giussepe Gagliardi‐Urrutia for collaborating with tissue samples and specimens. We thank Lourdes Alcaraz (MNCN‐CSIC) for helping with the molecular lab. We are also grateful to Andrew J. Crawford, Juan M. Guayasamin, and Martín Pereyra for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Ward Wheeler and Taran Grant kindly answered our questions regarding maximum likelihood analysis in POY. Two reviewers and the Associate Editor helped us to improve previous versions of the manuscript with their constructive criticism. Funding for this study was provided by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazil to LYE and SC‐F (scholarship numbers 830432/1999‐0 and 312744/2017‐0), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil to LYE (scholarship number 88887.179352/2018‐00) and projects CGL2014‐53523‐P and PGC2018‐097421‐B‐100 of the Spanish Government (PI, Ignacio De la Riva). We are grateful to Juan Carlos Chaparro (MUBI), Mirco Sol?, Victor Dill Orrico, Caio Vinicius De Mira-Mendes (UESC), and Giussepe Gagliardi-Urrutia for collaborating with tissue samples and specimens. We thank Lourdes Alcaraz (MNCN-CSIC) for helping with the molecular lab. We are also grateful to Andrew J. Crawford, Juan M. Guayasamin, and Mart?n Pereyra for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Ward Wheeler and Taran Grant kindly answered our questions regarding maximum likelihood analysis in POY. Two reviewers and the Associate Editor helped us to improve previous versions of the manuscript with their constructive criticism. Funding for this study was provided by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico (CNPq), Brazil to LYE and SC-F (scholarship numbers 830432/1999-0 and 312744/2017-0), Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES), Brazil to LYE (scholarship number 88887.179352/2018-00) and projects CGL2014-5352 ...
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus