Title
Medical devices: from licensing to coverage. highlights from Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico
Date Issued
01 November 2016
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Rey-Ares L.
Garay O.
Pichon Riviere A.
Garcia Marti S.
Gilardino R.
Cabra H.
Augustovski F.
Publisher(s)
Taylor and Francis Ltd
Abstract
Objectives: To describe and compare the requirements for medical devices licensing and reimbursement in four Latin-American countries. Methods: We conducted a literature search in major databases, and generic Internet engines, and interviewed key informants. Results: We included all publications describing regulation and/or coverage and enriched them with key informant’s interviews. We found that licensing processes are similar. The decision-making process for coverage is not formally different than the one used for drugs. Although countries differ, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico have an explicit process informed by Health Technology Assessment. In general, coverage policies are defined for procedures and don´t specify device brand or model, and for that reason they may reimburse without explicit one by one device evaluation. Conclusions: The process for licensing and reimbursement is broadly similar but less stringent than that for drugs. It allows the adoption of medical devices without individual comprehensive assessment.
Start page
1053
End page
1065
Volume
13
Issue
11
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Tecnología médica de laboratorio (análisis de muestras, tecnologías para el diagnóstico) Ciencias del cuidado de la salud y servicios (administración de hospitales, financiamiento)
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84992170319
PubMed ID
Source
Expert Review of Medical Devices
ISSN of the container
17434440
Sponsor(s)
This study was supported by Johnson and Johnson Medical Companies. The research project was conducted by IECS researchers independently, J&J authors provided information and were involved in the manuscript development. The views expressed by J&J authors do not necessarily reflect the views of the company. The publication of study results was not contingent on the sponsor’s approval or censorship of the manuscript.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus