Title
Immunogenicity and safety of tetravalent dengue vaccine in 2-11 year-olds previously vaccinated against yellow fever: Randomized, controlled, phase II study in Piura, Peru
Date Issued
07 September 2012
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Andrade T.
Terrones C.
Valladolid O.
Zambrano B.
Saville M.
Crevat D.
Abstract
In a randomized, placebo-controlled, monocenter, observer blinded study conducted in an area where dengue is endemic, we assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant, live, attenuated, tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (CYD-TDV) in 2-11 year-olds with varying levels of pre-existing yellow-fever immunity due to vaccination 1-7 years previously. 199 children received 3 injections of CYD-TDV (months 0, 6 and 12) and 99 received placebo (months 0 and 6) or pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (month 12). One month after the third dengue vaccination, serotype specific neutralizing antibody GMTs were in the range of 178-190 (1/dil) (versus 16.7-38.1 in the control group), a 10-20 fold-increase from baseline, and 94% of vaccines were seropositive to all four serotypes (versus 39% in the control group). There were no vaccine-related SAEs. The observed reactogenicity profile was consistent with phase I studies, with severity grade 1-2 injection site pain, headache, malaise and fever most frequently reported and no increase after subsequent vaccinations. Virologically confirmed dengue cases were seen after completion of the 3 doses: 1 in the CYD-TDV group (N= 199), and 3 in the control group (N= 99). A 3-dose regimen of CYD-TDV had a good safety profile in 2-11 year olds with a history of YF vaccination and elicited robust antibody responses that were balanced against the four serotypes. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Start page
5935
End page
5941
Volume
30
Issue
41
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Medicina tropical
Inmunología
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84865325628
PubMed ID
Source
Vaccine
ISSN of the container
0264410X
Sponsor(s)
Conflict of interest: CL was the principal investigator and TA, AG, CT and OV participated as co-investigators and study doctors, and received no direct payment from the study sponsor for their contributions. BZ, MS and DC designed the study and are employed by the sponsor. All authors reviewed the manuscript drafts, were involved in the decision to submit the manuscript, and approved the final version. The authors had access to the data and take full responsibility for the content of this contribution. Funding: This study was funded by Sanofi Pasteur. Role of Funding: Sanofi Pasteur provided financial support and was involved in the protocol design, data analysis and the decision to submit this manuscript.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus