Title
In vitro activity of clinafloxacin in comparison with other quinolones against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates in the presence and absence of reserpine
Date Issued
04 March 2002
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Ribera A.
Jurado A.
Marco F.
Del Valle O.
Mensa J.
Chaves J.
Hernández G.
Jiménez de Anta M.
Vila J.
Universitat de Barcelona
Abstract
A total of 33 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates were tested for their susceptibility to clinafloxacin in comparison with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin. The MIC50 and MIC90 were as follows: ciprofloxacin 4 and 64 μg/mL; clinafoxacin 0.5 and 4 μg/mL; levofloxacin 2 and 32 μg/mL; moxifloxacin 1 and 8 μg/mL; nalidixic acid 8 and 128 μg/mL; norfloxacin 64 and 256 μg/mL; sparfloxacin 1 and 16 μg/mL; and trovafloxacin 1 and 8 μg/mL. Clinafloxacin was the most active quinolone, with only a 15.1% of strains showing resistance. When the MICs were determined in the presence of 25 μg/ml of reserpine, the MIC90 of trovafloxacin and moxifloxacin did not change, whereas decreased 2-fold for clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin and nalidixic acid, and 4- and 8-fold for ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin respectively. No clinafloxacin-resistant strains were observed when the MIC was performed in the presence of reserpine. Therefore, clinafloxacin shows the better "in vitro"activity against these 33 strains of S.maltophilia. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Start page
123
End page
128
Volume
42
Issue
2
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Enfermedades infecciosas
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-0036178802
PubMed ID
Source
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
ISSN of the container
07328893
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus