Title
Accuracy of backscatter coefficient estimation in aberrating media using different phase aberration correction strategies - A simulation study
Date Issued
20 October 2014
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
conference paper
Publisher(s)
IEEE Computer Society
Abstract
Phase aberration is the distortion of the diffraction pattern when a wave propagates in a medium with an inhomogeneous sound speed. In this study, the accuracy of the estimation of backscatter coefficients (BSCs) in the presence of near-field phase aberrations was studied through simulations. Further, the accuracy was also evaluated when using two different phase aberration correction strategies prior to BSC estimation. Simulations were performed using the FIELD II software for pulsed ultrasound field calculation. The simulation utilized a 45 element, 3.5 MHz linear array with 70% bandwidth. The imaging medium consisted of randomly positioned circular scatterers having a diameter of 176 microns. Near field phase aberrators were applied to the transmit and receive signals of the simulation having 50, 75, and 100 ns RMS strength and a 3 mm correlation length. Phase aberrations were estimated using a multi-lag least squares estimation technique. BSCs were estimated using the reference phantom method and radiofrequency data segments with a length of 14 wavelengths and centered around the transducer transmit focus. BSC estimation accuracy was quantified using the average difference in dB between the theoretical and estimated curves within the -10 dB bandwidth of the transducer. The mean BSC estimation errors were -9.31, -12.82 and -15.58 dB in the presence of the 50, 75 and 100 ns aberrators, respectively. The use of aberration correction on receive was inadequate for the BSC accuracy for all three cases. The estimation errors for the 50 ns, 75 ns and 100 ns aberrators were -7.24, -12.66 dB and -14.68 dB, respectively. In contrast, the use of aberration correction on transmit-receive allowed an accurate BSC estimation, with estimation errors lower than 0.7 dB for the first two cases. These results suggest that phase aberration effects may adversely influence the performance of BSC estimation, and that a robust BSC-based tissue characterization may require compensating for the effects of aberration on both transmit and receive beams.
Start page
2438
End page
2441
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ingeniería eléctrica, Ingeniería electrónica Ingeniería médica
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84910029408
ISSN of the container
19485719
ISBN of the container
9781479970490
Conference
IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS: 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2014
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus