Title
Sexual dysfunction in middle-aged women: A multicenter Latin American study using the Female Sexual Function Index
Date Issued
01 November 2009
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Blümel J.E.
Chedraui P.
Baron G.
Belzares E.
Bencosme A.
Calle A.
Espinoza M.T.
Flores D.
Izaguirre H.
Leon-Leon P.
Lima S.
Monterrosa A.
Mostajo D.
Navarro D.
Onatra W.
Royer M.
Soto E.
Vallejo S.
Tserotas K.
Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil
Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of sexual dysfunction (SD) and associated risk factors among middle-aged Latin American women using one validated instrument. Methods: The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was applied to 7,243 healthy women aged 40 to 59 years who were users of 19 healthcare systems from 11 Latin American countries. An itemized questionnaire containing personal and partner sociodemographic data was also filled out. Results: Mean ± SD age of surveyed women was 49.0 ±5.7 years, with 11.6 years of schooling on average. There were 55.1% of women who were married, 46.8% who were postmenopausal, 14.1% who used hormonal therapy (HT), and 25.6% who were sexually inactive. Among those who were active (n = 5,391), the mean ± SD total FSFI score was 25.2 ± 5.9 and 56.8% of them presented SD (FSFI total score ≤26.55), with a prevalence varying from 21.0% to 98.5% depending on the center. Centers were grouped in terciles (according to mean ± SD prevalence). The tercile with higher SD prevalence (86.4%) compared with that with lower SD prevalence (32.2%) had significantly older women (49.5 ± 5.3 vs 48.0 ± 5.6 y) with a higher rate of vaginal dryness (60.4% vs 40.8%) and older partners (53.0 ± 6.9 vs 50.2 ± 7.5 y). Similarly, there was a significantly higher rate of married (68.5% vs 63.1%), postmenopausal (49.7% vs 39.3%), and HT-using women (23% vs 9.2%). There were no differences in regard to their health perception, history of oophorectomy, rape, and partner SD rate (27% vs 26.2%). The total FSFI score was significantly lower in the tercile with higher SD prevalence (22.0 ± 5.0 vs 27.5 ± 5.4). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (95% CIs) for the main risk factors associated with SD among those who were sexually active: bad lubrication, 3.86 (3.37-4.43); use of alternative menopausal therapies, 2.13 (1.60-2.84); partner SD, 1.89 (1.63-2.20); older women (>48 y), 1.84 (1.61-2.09); bladder problems, 1.47 (1.28-1.69); HT use, 1.39 (1.15-1.68); negative perception of female health status, 1.31 (1.05-1.64); and being married, 1.22 (1.07-1.40). Protective factors were higher educational level (women), partner faithfulness, and access to private healthcare. Conclusions: The prevalence of SD in this middle-aged Latin American series was found to be high, varying widely in different populations. A decrease in vaginal lubrication was the most important associated risk factor. Differences in the prevalence of risk factors among the studied groups, several of which are modifiable, could explain the variation of SD prevalence observed in this study. © 2009 by The North American Menopause Society.
Start page
1139
End page
1148
Volume
16
Issue
6
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ciencias socio biomédicas (planificación familiar, salud sexual, efectos políticos y sociales de la investigación biomédica)
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-73249123935
PubMed ID
Source
Menopause
ISSN of the container
10723714
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus