Title
Family variables, intellectual aptitudes, and Mexican estudents'reading achievement
Date Issued
01 January 2020
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Publisher(s)
Universidad de Almeria
Abstract
Introduction. Students' academic performance can be influenced by several of their contextual and personal factors. In some cases, it is influenced by the educational practices of their family of origin, and by parental support with homework and learning at home. Or in other cases, it is influenced by the characteristics of the students, as well as by their intellectual aptitudes. The aim of this study was to obtain an explicative model of relationships between contextual variables (students' perception of family support, and parents' self-evaluation of support provided to their children), students' intellectual aptitudes, parents' educational level, and academic achievement in reading comprehension upon completing elementary school. Method. The participants were 362 sixth graders from rural, indigenous private and public schools in Sonora and Morelos, Mexico. The study was conducted during the 2015 academic year. Parents' support for their children's learning at home was evaluated by versions of the Family Support Perception Questionnaire (FSPQ), one for the parents and another for students. The FSPQ evaluated four dimensions of parental support: 1. Homework Help /Reviewing, 2. Communication with school/Participation, 3. Conditions and Resources for studying at home, and 4. Monitor-ing/Communication with teachers. For assessment of academic performance in Reading Comprehension an instrument attached to the curriculum for the sixth-grade of elementary school was used, with 17 items evaluating five dimensions: 1. Identifying spelling errors in five short texts, 2. Inferring implicit information and understanding metaphors from narrative texts and short stories, 3. Recognizing figurative language in poetry, 4. Inferring the meaning of words in the dominant indigenous language, and 5. Identifying sections of a newspaper. Intellectual aptitudes were measured using reduced versions of two scales of the Screening Assessment for Gifted Elementary and Middle School Students (SAGES-2), validated for a Mexican context: 1. Thirteen items for the Language, Literature and Social Studies scale, and 17 items for the General Reasoning scale. Results. The results of a structural regression model with the EQS 6.4 program, showed that reading performance was explained mainly and significantly by the students' intellectual aptitudes, and secondly, by parents' support (as reported by parents themselves). However, family support as perceived by the students had no significant effects on reading performance. On the other hand, the parents' education level showed a significant direct effect on students' intellectual abilities, and an indirect effect on students' academic performance in reading comprehension. Discussion and Conclusion. The results show that the intellectual aptitude of the students is presented as a better predictor of their performance in reading comprehension than the variables of family support. One possible reason is that the Language Arts/Social Science subscale of SAGES-2 is probably highly associated with curricular content and learning related to reading comprehension. However, it is important to highlight the effect of two variables in the family context. First, selfperceived parental support had a positive effect, although less so, on student performance. The second aspect is that the parents' level of schooling had a significant effect on the intellectual skills assessed here.
Start page
375
End page
398
Volume
18
Issue
52
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ciencias de la educación
Demografía
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85098593325
Source
Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology
ISSN of the container
16995880
Sponsor(s)
This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Code of Ethics for Psychologists of the and the Code of Professional Conduct of the American Psychology Association (APA, 2017). The research protocol (No 15981-2010) was approved by the National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT -Spanish acronym) of Mexico, within the Call for Research Projects in Basic Science for 2010. The research protocol was approved by peer reviewers from CONACYT, which included, within its scope for evaluation, ethical concerns and alignment with the principles of the Mexican Code for Psychologists and the APA. Therefore, the research took place while CONACYT was the entity responsible for providing ethical oversight.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus