cris.boxmetadata.label.title
Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: A scoping review
cris.boxmetadata.label.dateissued
20 browse.startsWith.months.february 2019
cris.boxmetadata.label.accesslevel
open access
cris.boxmetadata.label.resourcetype
review
cris.boxmetadata.label.authors
ZAFRA TANAKA, JESSICA HANAE
VILLARREAL ZEGARRA, DAVID ROGELIO
TAYPE RONDAN, ALVARO RENZO
cris.boxmetadata.label.publisher
BioMed Central Ltd.
cris.boxmetadata.label.abstract
Background: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) should follow an adequate methodology using an evidence-based approach in order to provide reliable recommendations. However, little is known regarding the quality of CPGs for Depression, which precludes its adequate use by stakeholders and mental health professionals. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review to describe the characteristics and quality of CPGs for Depression in adults. Methods: We searched CPGs for Depression in adults in eighteen databases. We included those that were published in English or Spanish between January 2014 and May 2018 and were based on systematic reviews of the evidence. Two independent authors extracted the characteristics, type and number of recommendations, and quality (using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-II [AGREE-II]) of each included CPG. Results: We included eleven CPGs, of which 9/11 did not include the participation of patients in the development of the CPG, 4/11 CPGs had a score ≥ 70% in the overall evaluation of AGREE-II, and 3/11 CPGs had a score ≥ 70% in its third domain (rigor of development). In addition, only 5/11 CPGs shared their search strategy, while only 4/11 listed the selected studies they used to reach recommendations, and 7/11 CPGs did not clearly state which methodology they used to translate evidence into a recommendation. Conclusions: Most of evaluated CPGs did not take into account the patient's viewpoints, achieved a low score in the rigor of development domain, and did not clearly state the process used to reach the recommendations. Stakeholders, CPCGs developers, and CPGs users should take this into account when choosing CPGs, and interpreting and putting into practice their issued recommendations.
cris.boxmetadata.label.volume
19
cris.boxmetadata.label.issue
1
cris.boxmetadata.label.language
English
cris.boxmetadata.label.ocdeknowledgeArea
Psiquiatría
Otros temas de medicina clínica
cris.boxmetadata.label.subjects
cris.boxmetadata.label.doi
cris.boxmetadata.label.scopusidentifier
2-s2.0-85061989708
cris.boxmetadata.label.pubmedidentifier
cris.boxmetadata.label.source
BMC Psychiatry
cris.boxmetadata.label.containerissn
1471244X
peru-layout.shadow-copies
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus