cris.boxmetadata.label.title
A set of principles and practical suggestions for equitable fieldwork in biology
cris.boxmetadata.label.dateissued
23 browse.startsWith.months.august 2022
cris.boxmetadata.label.accesslevel
open access
cris.boxmetadata.label.resourcetype
journal article
cris.boxmetadata.label.authors
Ramírez-Castañeda V.
Westeen E.P.
Frederick J.
Amini S.
Wait D.R.
Achmadi A.S.
Andayani N.
Arida E.
Arifin U.
Bernal M.A.
Bonaccorso E.
Sanguila M.B.
Brown R.M.
Che J.
Hartiningtias D.
Hiller A.E.
Iskandar D.T.
Jiménez R.A.
Khelifa R.
Márquez R.
Martínez-Fonseca J.G.
Parra J.L.
Peñalba J.V.
Pinto-García L.
Razafindratsima O.H.
Ron S.R.
Souza S.
Supriatna J.
Bowie R.C.K.
Cicero C.
McGuire J.A.
Tarvin R.D.
Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad Del Cusco
cris.boxmetadata.label.publisher
National Academy of Sciences
cris.boxmetadata.label.abstract
Field biology is an area of research that involves working directly with living organisms in situ through a practice known as "fieldwork."Conducting fieldwork often requires complex logistical planning within multiregional or multinational teams, interacting with local communities at field sites, and collaborative research led by one or a few of the core teammembers. However, existing power imbalances stemming from geopolitical history, discrimination, and professional position, among other factors, perpetuate inequities when conducting these research endeavors. After reflecting on our own research programs, we propose four general principles to guide equitable, inclusive, ethical, and safe practices in field biology: be collaborative, be respectful, be legal, and be safe. Although many biologists already structure their field programs around these principles or similar values, executing equitable research practices can prove challenging and requires careful consideration, especially by those in positions with relatively greater privilege. Based on experiences and input from a diverse group of global collaborators, we provide suggestions for action-oriented approaches to make field biology more equitable, with particular attention to how those with greater privilege can contribute. While we acknowledge that not all suggestions will be applicable to every institution or program, we hope that they will generate discussions and provide a baseline for training in proactive, equitable fieldwork practices.
cris.boxmetadata.label.volume
119
cris.boxmetadata.label.issue
34
cris.boxmetadata.label.language
English
cris.boxmetadata.label.ocdeknowledgeArea
Ciencias naturales
cris.boxmetadata.label.doi
cris.boxmetadata.label.scopusidentifier
2-s2.0-85136909344
cris.boxmetadata.label.pubmedidentifier
cris.boxmetadata.label.source
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
cris.boxmetadata.label.containerissn
00278424
peru-layout.shadow-copies Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus