Title
Payments for ecosystem services: A new way of conserving biodiversity in forests
Date Issued
02 December 2009
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Wertz-Kanounnikoff S.
European Forest Institute
Abstract
The concept of payments for ecosystem services (PES) is probably the most promising innovation in conservation since Rio 1992, slowly but certainly to expand in the tropics. In a global context of stagnating or even decreasing public funding for biodiversity conservation, PES have the potential both to raise some new funds, and to absorb more efficiently money previously spent otherwise. The most novel and persuasive feature of PES lies in its "businesslike" conditional payment form, which differs from traditional conservation projects. The most promising entry point for international PES transfers for biodiversity interests seems to be to piggyback on the currently revived debate on reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD). The novel idea here would be to make agreements at the nation-state level, either bilaterally or multilaterally, and either within or outside the Kyoto framework. However, to take advantage of this opportunity, biodiversity conservation and forest stakeholders would need to be more proactive in the REDD debate than we have seen so far. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Start page
576
End page
596
Volume
28
Issue
May 3
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ciencias del medio ambiente
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-70649100061
Source
Journal of Sustainable Forestry
ISSN of the container
10549811
Source funding
World Wildlife Fund
Sponsor(s)
as the Costa Rican PSA (see Box 1) or the aforementioned EU and U.S. ones, the state acts implicitly as representative of several service users and makes integrated payments for several services from the same plot, though here the partial service contribution from plots is usually not measured. The World Wide Fund for Nature’s (WWF) Danube initiative, financed by GEF, aims to reward conservation in the lower Danube and its delta (Bulgaria, Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine), providing joint biodiversity and watershed benefits. In general, service bundling is an adequate strategy only when the same buyer has several simultaneous service interests, e.g., GEF or a nation state having a broad environmental mandate involving several services. To date, the PSA program has been financed primarily from revenues of the national fossil fuel tax (about US$10 million/yr), with additional financial support from, inter alia, two grants of the Global Environment Facility, a World Bank loan, and a grant from the German aid agency (Kreditanstalf fur Wideraufbau, KFW). Another US$0.5 million/yr is generated from voluntary agreements with individual water users. The volume of direct payments from environmental service beneficiaries will increase substantially with the gradual introduction of a new water tariff and new opportunities from forest carbon finance.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus