Title
The strengths and weaknesses of species distribution models in biome delimitation
Date Issued
01 October 2020
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Moonlight P.W.
Silva de Miranda P.L.
Cardoso D.
Dexter K.G.
Oliveira-Filho A.T.
Pennington R.T.
Ramos G.
Särkinen T.E.
Publisher(s)
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract
Aim: The aim was to test whether species distribution models (SDMs) can reproduce major macroecological patterns in a species-rich, tropical region and provide recommendations for using SDMs in areas with sparse biotic inventory data. Location: North-east Brazil, including Minas Gerais. Time period: Present. Major taxa studied: Flowering plants. Methods: Species composition estimates derived from stacked SDMs (s-SDMs) were compared with data from 1,506 inventories of 933 woody plant species from north-east Brazil. Both datasets were used in hierarchical clustering analyses to delimit floristic units that correspond to biomes. The ability of s-SDMs to predict the identity, functional composition and floristic composition of biomes was compared across geographical and environmental space. Results: The s-SDMs and inventory data both resolved four major biomes that largely corresponded in terms of their distribution, floristics and function. The s-SDMs proved excellent at identifying broad-scale biomes and their function, but misassigned many individual sites in complex savanna–forest mosaics. Main conclusions: Our results show that s-SDMs have a unique role to play in describing macroecological patterns in areas lacking inventory data and for poorly known taxa. s-SDMs accurately predict floristic and functional macroecological patterns but struggle in areas where non-climatic factors, such as fire or soil, play key roles in governing distributions.
Start page
1770
End page
1784
Volume
29
Issue
10
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ciencias de las plantas, Botánica
Ecología
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85087656640
Source
Global Ecology and Biogeography
ISSN of the container
1466822X
Sponsor(s)
This paper, P.W.M., T.E.S., D.C. and R.T.P. were funded by the Natural Environment Research Council‐Newton grant NE/N012526/1 “Nordeste: New Science for a Neglected Biome”. D.C. and G.R. were funded by the Royal Society Advanced Fellowship grant NAF/R1/180331, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa da Bahia (Universal no. APP0037/2016), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Research Productivity PQ‐2 grant 308244/2018‐4. P.L.M.S. was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior grant 99999.013197/2013‐04 under the Science without Borders Programme and the Université de Liège post‐doctoral fellowship under the IPD‐STEMA scheme (2019). We thank Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental (CRIA) and Reflora for sharing their complete distribution datasets.
This paper, P.W.M., T.E.S., D.C. and R.T.P. were funded by the Natural Environment Research Council-Newton grant NE/N012526/1 ?Nordeste: New Science for a Neglected Biome?. D.C. and G.R. were funded by the Royal Society Advanced Fellowship grant NAF/R1/180331, Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa da Bahia (Universal no. APP0037/2016), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico Research Productivity PQ-2 grant 308244/2018-4. P.L.M.S. was supported by the Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior grant 99999.013197/2013-04 under the Science without Borders Programme and the Universit? de Li?ge post-doctoral fellowship under the IPD-STEMA scheme (2019). We thank Centro de Refer?ncia em Informa??o Ambiental (CRIA) and Reflora for sharing their complete distribution datasets.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus