Title
Complement C4A Regulates Autoreactive B Cells in Murine Lupus
Date Issued
03 November 2020
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Simoni L.
Presumey J.
van der Poel C.E.
Castrillon C.
Chang S.E.
Utz P.J.
Carroll M.C.
Publisher(s)
Elsevier B.V.
Abstract
Simoni et al. address a long-standing question about how complement C4A and C4B isoforms differ in function in vivo in autoimmunity. They find that C4A leads to an increased protection in humoral autoimmunity relative to C4B. Autoantibody diversity is likewise dependent on the C4 protein isotype. © 2020 The Authors Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe autoimmune disease mediated by pathogenic autoantibodies. While complement protein C4 is associated with SLE, its isoforms (C4A and C4B) are not equal in their impact. Despite being 99% homologous, genetic studies identified C4A as more protective than C4B. By generating gene-edited mouse strains expressing either human C4A or C4B and crossing these with the 564lgi lupus strain, we show that, overall, C4A-like 564Igi mice develop less humoral autoimmunity than C4B-like 564Igi mice. This includes a decrease in the number of GCs, autoreactive B cells, autoantibodies, and memory B cells. The higher efficiency of C4A in inducing self-antigen clearance is associated with the follicular exclusion of autoreactive B cells. These results explain how the C4A isoform is protective in lupus and suggest C4A as a possible replacement therapy in lupus. © 2020 The Authors
Volume
33
Issue
5
Number
108330
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ingeniería médica Tecnologías que implican la manipulación de células, tejidos, órganos o todo el organismo
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85094938796
PubMed ID
Source
Cell Reports
ISSN of the container
22111247
Sponsor(s)
National Institutes of Health 5R01AI130307 NIH National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases R01AR074105 NIAMS Institut Necker-Enfants Malades INEM We thank all of the members of the M.C.C. lab for suggestions and help with experiments and feedback on the manuscript; E.M. Carroll for valuable assistance; C. Usher for editorial assistance; K. Holscher for technical support; J.-C. Weill and Agnes Reynaud (Institut Necker Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes) for the generous gift of the aicda-YFP reporter mice; and the Flow Cytometry core and Harry Leung of the Optical Microscopy core at the PCMM for technical assistance. This research was supported by NIH grants 5R01AI130307 and 5R01AR074105, to M.C.C. M.C.C. and L.S. conceived the project. J.P. and C.E.v.d.P. generated the C4A and C4B mouse lines. M.C.C. and L.S. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. L.S. J.P. and S.E.C. performed the experiments. L.S. analyzed the data. C.C. S.E.C. and P.J.U. provided crucial reagents and expertise. M.C.C. supervised the project. All of the authors provided critical feedback. The authors declare no competing interests. We thank all of the members of the M.C.C. lab for suggestions and help with experiments and feedback on the manuscript; E.M. Carroll for valuable assistance; C. Usher for editorial assistance; K. Holscher for technical support; J.-C. Weill and Agnes Reynaud (Institut Necker Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes) for the generous gift of the aicda-YFP reporter mice; and the Flow Cytometry core and Harry Leung of the Optical Microscopy core at the PCMM for technical assistance. This research was supported by NIH grants 5R01AI130307 and 5R01AR074105 , to M.C.C.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus