Title
Survival by colon cancer stage and screening interval in Lynch syndrome: A prospective Lynch syndrome database report
Date Issued
14 October 2019
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Seppälä T.T.
Sampson J.R.
MacRae F.
Winship I.
Evans D.G.
Scott R.J.
Burn J.
Möslein G.
Bernstein I.
Pylvänäinen K.
Renkonen-Sinisalo L.
Lepistö A.
Lindblom A.
Plazzer J.P.
Tjandra D.
Thomas H.
Green K.
Lalloo F.
Crosbie E.J.
Hill J.
Capella G.
Pineda M.
Navarro M.
Vidal J.B.
Rønlund K.
Nielsen R.T.
Yilmaz M.
Elvang L.L.
Katz L.
Nielsen M.
Ten Broeke S.W.
Nakken S.
Hovig E.
Sunde L.
Kloor M.
Knebel Doeberitz M.V.
Ahadova A.
Lindor N.
Steinke-Lange V.
Holinski-Feder E.
Mecklin J.P.
Møller P.
Oslo University Hospita
Publisher(s)
BioMed Central Ltd.
Abstract
Background: We previously reported that in pathogenic mismatch repair (path-MMR) variant carriers, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) was not reduced when colonoscopy was undertaken more frequently than once every 3 years, and that CRC stage and interval since last colonoscopy were not correlated. Methods: The Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD) that records outcomes of surveillance was examined to determine survival after colon cancer in relation to the time since previous colonoscopy and pathological stage. Only path-MMR variants scored by the InSiGHT variant database as class 4 or 5 (clinically actionable) were included in the analysis. Results: Ninety-nine path-MMR carriers had no cancer prior to or at first colonoscopy, but subsequently developed colon cancer. Among these, 96 were 65 years of age or younger at diagnosis, and included 77 path-MLH1, 17 path-MSH2, and 2 path-MSH6 carriers. The number of cancers detected within < 1.5, 1.5-2.5, 2.5-3.5 and at > 3.5 years after previous colonoscopy were 9, 43, 31 and 13, respectively. Of these, 2, 8, 4 and 3 were stage III, respectively, and only one stage IV (interval 2.5-3.5 years) disease. Ten-year crude survival after colon cancer were 93, 94 and 82% for stage I, II and III disease, respectively (p < 0.001). Ten-year crude survival when the last colonoscopy had been < 1.5, 1.5-2.5, 2.5-3.5 or > 3.5 years before diagnosis, was 89, 90, 90 and 92%, respectively (p = 0.91). Conclusions: In path-MLH1 and path-MSH2 carriers, more advanced colon cancer stage was associated with poorer survival, whereas time since previous colonoscopy was not. Although the numbers are limited, together with our previously reported findings, these results may be in conflict with the view that follow-up of path-MMR variant carriers with colonoscopy intervals of less than 3 years provides significant benefit.
Volume
17
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Oncología Medicina general, Medicina interna
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85075119347
Source
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
ISSN of the container
17312302
Sponsor(s)
We would like to express our gratitude to Heikki Järvinen, Beatriz Alcala-Repo and Marianne Haeusler for their efforts during the years. TTS and J-PM are supported by the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, the Instrumentarium Science Foundation, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, The Finnish Cancer Foundation, Jane and Aatos Erkko foundation and State Research Funding. DGE and EJC are both supported through the National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-1215-20007). The Spanish contribution: GC and MP were funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and cofunded by FEDER funds -a way to build Europe- (grant SAF2015-68016-R) and the CIBERONC, the Carlos III Health Institute, the Scientific Foundation Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer and the Government of Catalonia. The Welsh Contribution: Wales Gene Park. The Norwegian contribution: Norwegian Cancer Society, contract 194751- 2017 for funding. Work relevant for the German contribution was funded in part by Wilhelm Sander Foundation (2016.056.1) and German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG; KFO227, KL2354). The study sponsors did not have a role in planning the study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus