Title
Cognitive sex differences in reasoning tasks: Evidence from Brazilian samples of educational settings
Date Issued
01 January 2013
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Abstract
Sex differences on the Attention Test (AC), the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM), and the Brazilian Cognitive Battery (BPR5), were investigated using four large samples (total N=6780), residing in the states of Minas Gerais and São Paulo. The majority of samples used, which were obtained from educational settings, could be considered a nonprobability sampling. Females outperformed males on the AC (by 2 IQ points), whereas males slightly outperformed females on the SPM (by 1.5 IQ points). On the BPR5, sex differences favoring males were statistically significant (on average 6.2 IQ points). The largest difference was in Mechanical Reasoning (13 IQ points), and the smallest was in Spatial Reasoning (5 IQ points). In addition, two methods were adopted for determining whether sex differences existed at the level of general intelligence. First, a g factor score was estimated after principal axis factoring of test scores. Men had an advantage of 3.8 IQ points (statistically significant) on the g score, which was reduced to 2.7 IQ points (not significant), when the g score was estimated without including Mechanical Reasoning. Second, a confirmatory factor analysis approach was conducted that allowed testing of mean differences at the latent variable level. Again, sex differences favoring males were found (0.23 or 3.44 IQ points). Regarding educational and SES variables, some sex differences favoring males were found in the SPM and in the BPR5. In general, our results agree with studies that identify small, but consistent cognitive sex differences in reasoning tasks. Societal implications are discussed. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.
Start page
70
End page
84
Volume
41
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Psicología (incluye terapias de aprendizaje, habla, visual y otras discapacidades físicas y mentales)
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84870842894
Source
Intelligence
Resource of which it is part
Intelligence
ISSN of the container
01602896
Sponsor(s)
The research referred to in this article is based on datasets from diverse projects supported by grants funded by the Foundation for Research Support of the Minas Gerais state-FAPEMIG (no. PPM 00030–09 ), Brazilian National Research Council — CNPq (no. 310495/2009-1 ), and Federal Agency of Support and Evaluation of Postgraduate Education — CAPES (no. 23072.012344/2011-84 ). We would like to thank to professors Aljoscha Neubauer and Tara Madhyastha for their helpful comments to previous versions of this article. In addition, we are grateful to psychologist collaborators and our graduate students: Elizabeth do Nascimento, Sabrina Barroso, Mariana Telles, Claudia Terumi, Rodrigo Silva Leite, Tatiane Dias Bacelar, Álvaro José Lelé, Carlos Guilherme Schlottfeldt, Eni Ribeiro da Silva and Marco Antonio Alvarenga, for their help in the data and references collecting.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus