Title
Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in women older than 25 years: 7-year follow-up of the phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled VIVIANE study
Date Issued
01 October 2016
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Wheeler C.M.
Skinner S.R.
Del Rosario-Raymundo M.R.
Garland S.M.
Chatterjee A.
Lazcano-Ponce E.
Salmerón J.
McNeil S.
Stapleton J.T.
Bouchard C.
Martens M.G.
Money D.M.
Quek S.C.
Romanowski B.
ter Harmsel B.
Prilepskaya V.
Fong K.L.
Kitchener H.
Minkina G.
Lim Y.K.T.
Stoney T.
Chakhtoura N.
Cruickshank M.E.
Savicheva A.
da Silva D.P.
Ferguson M.
Molijn A.C.
Quint W.G.V.
Hardt K.
Descamps D.
Suryakiran P.V.
Karkada N.
Geeraerts B.
Dubin G.
Struyf F.
Publisher(s)
Lancet Publishing Group
Elsevier
Abstract
Background Although the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is greatest in young women, women older than 25 years remain at risk. We present data from the VIVIANE study of the HPV 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in adult women after 7 years of follow-up. Methods In this phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, healthy women older than 25 years were enrolled (age stratified: 26ā35 years, 36ā45 years, and ā„46 years). Up to 15% in each age stratum had a history of HPV infection or disease. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive HPV 16/18 vaccine or aluminium hydroxide control, with an internet-based system. The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against 6-month persistent infection or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or greater (CIN1+) associated with HPV 16/18. We did analyses in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy and total vaccinated cohort. Data for the combined primary endpoint in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96Ā·2% CI around the point estimate was greater than 30%. For all other endpoints and cohorts, data were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96Ā·2% CI was greater than 0%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00294047. Findings The first participant was enrolled on Feb 16, 2006, and the last study visit took place on Jan 29, 2014. 4407 women were in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy (n=2209 vaccine, n=2198 control) and 5747 women in the total vaccinated cohort (n=2877 vaccine, n=2870 control). At month 84, in women seronegative for the corresponding HPV type in the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy, vaccine efficacy against 6-month persistent infection or CIN1+ associated with HPV 16/18 was significant in all age groups combined (90Ā·5%, 96Ā·2% CI 78Ā·6ā96Ā·5). Vaccine efficacy against HPV 16/18-related cytological abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and CIN1+ was also significant. We also noted significant cross-protective efficacy against 6-month persistent infection with HPV 31 (65Ā·8%, 96Ā·2% CI 24Ā·9ā85Ā·8) and HPV 45 (70Ā·7%, 96Ā·2% CI 34Ā·2ā88Ā·4). In the total vaccinated cohort, vaccine efficacy against CIN1+ irrespective of HPV was significant (22Ā·9%, 96Ā·2% CI 4Ā·8ā37Ā·7). Serious adverse events related to vaccination occurred in five (0Ā·2%) of 2877 women in the vaccine group and eight (0Ā·3%) of 2870 women in the control group. Interpretation In women older than 25 years, the HPV 16/18 vaccine continues to protect against infections, cytological abnormalities, and lesions associated with HPV 16/18 and CIN1+ irrespective of HPV type, and infection with non-vaccine types HPV 31 and HPV 45 over 7 years of follow-up. Funding GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.
Start page
1154
End page
1168
Volume
16
Issue
10
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
BiologĆa celular, MicrobiologĆa
OncologĆa
PatologĆa
Obstetricia, GinecologĆa
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84977668330
PubMed ID
Source
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
ISSN of the container
14733099
Sponsor(s)
The institutions of NC, CMW, SRS, JTS, and TS received a contract from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies for the clinical trial site. CMW's and SRS's institutions received reimbursements for travel related to publication activities and for HPV vaccine studies. CMW's institution also received funding from Merck to do HPV vaccine trials, and from Roche Molecular Systems equipment and reagents for HPV genotyping studies, outside of this study. SRS's institution received honoraria and reimbursement for travel associated with participation on the advisory board, educational symposia, and funds for investigator initiated research from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. SRS's institution also received funds for investigator initiated research from bioCSL. AC received reimbursement from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies for travel related to publications activities, and from Merck as consultant. MEC received reimbursement from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies for travel related to publications activities. HK received funding from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies to support conduct of the trial in his hospital. He is also a member of the HPV sub-group of the UK Joint Committee of Vaccination and Immunisation. JTS and MGM received grants from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. JTS's institution received a contract from the Merck to act as a clinical trial site for this and other studies. SM received grants as an investigator from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies and from Pfizer Canada. She also received speaker honoraria from Merck. SCQ received honoraria and travel expenses from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies for speaking at various symposia. TS received honoraria from the GSK group of companies for study committee membership (Asia Pacific study follow-up committee for Zoster studies), for conference attendance, and travel support. Her institution also received additional funding from a bioCSL grant for a project of which she is an investigator, funded by National Health and Medical Research Council. She also received travel support for participation in study investigator meetings from Novartis Vaccine and Diagnostics, Sanofi Pasteur, Alios bio Pharma, and Pfizer. AS received grants and fees from the GSK group of companies to participate in an epidemiological study (HERACLES). BR received research grants from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies through her institution in addition to fees for speaking engagements, travel support, and expert testimony. JS received grants from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies, Qiagen and Merck Inc. MRDR-R received honorarium as a principal investigator, support for travel to meetings for the study, and payment for lectures including service on speakers bureaus from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. SMG received grants through her institution for the VIVIANE study from GlaxoSmithKline group of companies, grants from CSL (Cervical Cancer Australia for HPV) through her institution for fare and accommodation to participate to Merck Cervical Cancer Global Advisory Board and Merck Scientific Advisory Board. She received a researcher initiated grant from Merck to perform surveillance RPP in Australia after HPV vaccines and fees for travel, accommodation, meeting expenses unrelated to activities listed, attending international conferences, and work performed in her own time. KLF received a grant from the Singapore General Hospital. CB received grants from the GSK group of companies and Merck as a principal investigator for her research centre. She also received honorarium for lectures and a travel grant for attending an international scientific meeting from Merck. GD was employed by the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies at the time of the study. GD and FS and own stock shares and stock options from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. GD has several patents in the HPV and herpes simplex virus vaccine fields. He is currently a full-time employee of Takeda Pharmaceuticals and receives salary and stock shares. BG, FS, PVS, NK, KH, and DD are employees of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. BG, KH, and DD own stock options from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. ACM and WGVQ received payment for services during the conduct of the study and received funding through their institution to do HPV vaccine studies from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. ACM received support for travel to meetings for the study from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. CSV, VP, DMM, GM, YKTL, EL-P, DPdS, MF, and BtH declare no competing interests.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción CientĆfica
Scopus