cris.boxmetadata.label.title
How multiple episodes of exclusive breastfeeding impact estimates of exclusive breastfeeding duration: report from the eight-site MAL-ED birth cohort study
cris.boxmetadata.label.dateissued
01 browse.startsWith.months.october 2016
cris.boxmetadata.label.accesslevel
open access
cris.boxmetadata.label.resourcetype
journal article
cris.boxmetadata.label.authors
Ambikapathi R.
Lee G.O.
Mahopo C.
Patil C.L.
Maciel B.L.
Turab A.
Islam M.M.
Ulak M.
Bose A.
Pendergast L.L.
Murray-Kolb L.E.
Lang D.
McCormick B.J.J.
Caulfield L.E.
cris.boxmetadata.label.publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
cris.boxmetadata.label.abstract
The duration of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is often defined as the time from birth to the first non-breast milk food/liquid fed (EBFLONG), or it is estimated by calculating the proportion of women at a given infant age who EBF in the previous 24 h (EBFDHS). Others have measured the total days or personal prevalence of EBF (EBFPREV), recognizing that although non-EBF days may occur, EBF can be re-initiated for extended periods. We compared breastfeeding metrics in the MAL-ED study; infants' breastfeeding trajectories were characterized from enrollment (median 7 days, IQR: 4, 12) to 180 days at eight sites. During twice-weekly surveillance, caretakers were queried about infant feeding the prior day. Overall, 101 833 visits and 356 764 child days of data were collected from 1957 infants. Median duration of EBFLONG was 33 days (95% CI: 32–36), compared to 49 days based on the EBFDHS. Median EBFPREV was 66 days (95% CI: 62–70). Differences were because of the return to EBF after a non-EBF period. The median number of returns to EBF was 2 (IQR: 1, 3). When mothers re-initiated EBF (second episode), infants gained an additional 18.8 days (SD: 25.1) of EBF, and gained 13.7 days (SD: 18.1) (third episode). In settings where women report short gaps in EBF, programmes should work with women to return to EBF. Interventions could positively influence the duration of these additional periods of EBF and their quantification should be considered in impact evaluation studies. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationstartpage
740
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationendpage
756
cris.boxmetadata.label.volume
12
cris.boxmetadata.label.issue
4
cris.boxmetadata.label.language
English
cris.boxmetadata.label.ocdeknowledgeArea
Nutrición, Dietética
cris.boxmetadata.label.subjects
cris.boxmetadata.label.doi
cris.boxmetadata.label.scopusidentifier
2-s2.0-84988625253
cris.boxmetadata.label.pubmedidentifier
cris.boxmetadata.label.source
Maternal and Child Nutrition
cris.boxmetadata.label.containerissn
17408695
peru-layout.shadow-copies
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus