Title
Influence of the growth pattern on cortical bone thickness and mini-implant stability
Date Issued
01 November 2020
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
de Menezes C.C.
Barros S.E.
Tonello D.L.
Garib D.
Bellini-Pereira S.A.
Janson G.
Universidade de São Paulo
Publisher(s)
Dental Press Editora Ltda
Abstract
Introduction: Controversial reports suggest a relationship between growth pattern and cortical alveolar bone thickness, and its effect in the use of mini-implants. Objective: The main purpose of this study was to assess the influence of the growth pattern on the cortical alveolar bone thickness and on the stability and success rate of mini-implants. Methods: Fifty-six mini-implants were inserted in the buccal region of the maxilla of 30 patients. These patients were allocated into two groups, based on their growth pattern (horizontal group [HG] and vertical group [VG]). Cortical thickness was measured using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Stability of mini-implants, soft tissue in the insertion site, sensitivity during loading and plaque around the mini-implants were evaluated once a month. Intergroup comparisons were performed using t tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and Fisher exact tests. Correlations were evaluated with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: The cortical bone thickness was significantly greater in the HG at the maxillary labial anterior region and at the mandibular buccal posterior and labial anterior regions. There was a significant negative correlation between Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA) and the labial cortical thickness of the maxilla, and with the labial and lingual cortical bone thicknesses of the mandible. No significant intergroup difference was found for mini-implant mobility and success rate. No associated factor influenced stability of the mini-implants. Conclusions: Growth pattern affects the alveolar bone cortical thickness in specific areas of the maxilla and mandible, with horizontal patients presenting greater cortical bone thickness. However, this fact may have no influence on the stability and success rate of mini-implants in the maxillary buccal posterior region.
Start page
33
End page
42
Volume
25
Issue
6
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Odontología, Cirugía oral, Medicina oral
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85100343396
PubMed ID
Source
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
ISSN of the container
21769451
Sponsor(s)
This study was financed in part by the Coorde-nação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES), Finance Code 001; and by grant nº 09/06925-0, São Paulo Research Founda-tion (FAPESP).
This study was financed in part by the Coorde-nação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES), Finance Code 001; and by grant nº 09/06925-0, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus