Title
Evaluation of the selective antibacterial activity of Eucalyptus globulus and Pimenta pseudocaryophyllus essential oils individually and in combination on Enterococcus faecalis and Lactobacillus rhamnosus
Date Issued
2018
Access level
restricted access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Publisher(s)
Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract
Essential oils (EOs), as substitutes for antibiotics in animal diets, should have selective antibacterial activity between pathogenic and beneficial bacteria from the animal gut. Thus, this study evaluated the selective antibacterial activity of Eucalyptus globulus (EG) and Pimenta pseudocaryophyllus (PP) EOs on Enterococcus faecalis as a surrogate model of pathogenic bacterium and on Lactobacillus rhamnosus as a beneficial bacterium model. The EOs antibacterial activity was evaluated by determination of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), minimal bactericidal concentration (MBCs), and fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices. The time-kill and sequential exposure assays were also performed, but using only the EG oil, which was the best selective EO, since it had a MIC lower on E. faecalis (7.4 mg/mL) than on L. rhamnosus (14.8 mg/mL). FIC index values showed that the combination of the two EOs had an indifferent effect (1.25 and 2.03) on E. faecalis and an additive effect (1.00) on L. rhamnosus. The time-kill assay showed that EG oil was able to kill E. faecalis within 15 min of treatment (~5 log reduction) and caused a reduction ~3 log of L. rhamnosus viability. The sequential exposure assay showed that EG oil (at MIC/2) produced higher reduction on E. faecalis viability (~3 log) than on L. rhamnosus (~2 log) as well. Therefore, L. rhamnosus presented higher tolerance to the antibacterial activity of EG oil than E. faecalis did. © 2018, Canadian Science Publishing. All rights reserved.
Start page
844
End page
855
Volume
64
Issue
11
Number
4
Language
English
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85055643450
PubMed ID
Source
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
ISSN of the container
0008-4166
Source funding
Sponsor(s)
The authors are grateful to the Ministerio de Edu-cación del Perú from the Peruvian government for Carmen M.S. Ambrosio M.Sc. scholarship, granted by the program Programa Nacional de Becas y Crédito Educativo (PRONABEC). Also, the author thanks CIENCIACTIVA for the recent Carmen M.S. Ambrosio Ph.D. scholarship, from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Inovación Tecnológica (CONCYTEC - Peru; Contract 278-2015-FONDECYT). Authors’ contributions: CA, conception and drafting of the work, analysis and interpretation of results, writing and design of this manuscript. SDA, design of GC–MS methodology, GC–MS analysis, and critical manuscript review. AM, support with microbiology expertise and critical manuscript review. EDG, conception and drafting of the work, analysis and interpretation of results, guidance in all stages of the work, critical review and final approval of the last version of this manuscript to be published. Conflict of interest: the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica