Title
The incremental benefit of functional imaging in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a systematic review
Date Issued
25 September 2015
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Brito J.P.
Asi N.
Gionfriddo M.R.
Norman C.
Leppin A.L.
Undavalli C.
Wang Z.
Prustsky G.
Elraiyah T.A.
Prokop L.J.
Murad M.H.
Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
Publisher(s)
Humana Press Inc.
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the major imaging modalities used for the localization of catecholamine-producing tumors (pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma). Functional imaging (FI) offers an alternative approach to localize, evaluate, and stage these tumors. Our objective was to describe the additive benefit of FI studies for patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPG) who have undergone MRI or CT scan evaluation. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus from database inception through June 2012 for studies that included patients with biochemically proven PPGs who underwent CT or MRI and additional FI for the localization of PPGs. We included 32 studies enrolling a total of 1,264 patients with a mean age of 43-years old. The studies were uncontrolled and evaluated six FI modalities. FI tests provided small additive value to CT/MRI, aiding in the localization of only 24/1,445 primary cases (1.4 %) and 28/805 metastatic cases (3.5 %). In metastatic cases, 6-[F-18]fluoro-l-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) and fluorodopamine-PET (FDA) were the FI tests most successful at identifying disease missed by CT/MRI, providing additional benefit in 6/60 (10 %) and 5/78 (6.4 %) cases, respectively. No clinically significant findings were observed in any of the predefined subgroups. No study evaluated the impact of FI on the completeness of surgical resection or other patient-important outcomes. Observational evidence suggests that FI tests have a limited additional role in patients with PPGs who have undergone CT/MRI evaluation. However, the role of FI tests in specific subgroups of patients with atypical presentations (metastatic, extra-adrenal) as well as the use of hybrid FI tests should be explored. Further research should also evaluate the impact of FI tests on patient-important outcomes
Start page
176
End page
186
Volume
50
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Endocrinología, Metabolismo (incluyendo diabetes, hormonas) Radiología, Medicina nuclear, Imágenes médicas
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84940436980
PubMed ID
Source
Endocrine
ISSN of the container
1355008X
Sponsor(s)
This review was commissioned and funded by a contract for The Endocrine Society.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus