cris.boxmetadata.label.title
Superstimulatory response and oocyte collection in North American bison during the non-breeding season
cris.boxmetadata.label.dateissued
01 browse.startsWith.months.august 2013
cris.boxmetadata.label.accesslevel
metadata only access
cris.boxmetadata.label.resourcetype
journal article
cris.boxmetadata.label.authors
University of Saskatchewan
cris.boxmetadata.label.abstract
A 2. ×. 2 design was used to compare the ovarian response and oocyte collection characteristics in bison given a superstimulatory dose of eCG or FSH, with or without a follow-up dose of LH. Follicular wave emergence was synchronized by follicle ablation (Day -1) and bison were assigned randomly to two superstimulatory treatment groups ( n=10 per group): (i) a single intramuscular dose of 2500. IU of eCG given on Day 0, or (ii) two subcutaneous doses of 200. mg of FSH given on Days 0 and 2. On Day 4, 200. mg of LH was given intramuscularly in 5 bison in each superstimulatory treatment group. The study was done in two replicates ( n=20 per replicate) involving a crossover design so that each animal was given the opposite superstimulatory treatment (eCG or FSH) during successive replicates. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) were collected by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration, and were classified according to morphologic attributes as compact, expanded, or denuded. Superstimulatory treatment with FSH (vs. eCG) resulted in the development of more follicles ≥5. mm (14.2. ±. 1.41 vs. 8.2. ±. 0.67; P<. 0.05; mean. ±. SEM), and more follicles aspirated (12.4. ±. 1.3 vs. 6.3. ±. 0.6; P<. 0.04). Follow-up treatment with LH (vs. no LH) resulted in a greater proportion of expanded COC (37% vs. 15%; P<. 0.05), and a tendency for a higher COC collection rate (61% vs. 54%; P=0.08). In summary, superstimulation with FSH (vs. eCG) resulted in twice as many follicles available for aspiration and nearly twice as many COC collected in bison during the anovulatory season, and follow-up treatment with LH increased the proportion of expanded COC collected. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationstartpage
147
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationendpage
152
cris.boxmetadata.label.volume
140
cris.boxmetadata.label.issue
browse.startsWith.months.april 3
cris.boxmetadata.label.language
English
cris.boxmetadata.label.ocdeknowledgeArea
Ciencia veterinaria
Biología celular, Microbiología
cris.boxmetadata.label.doi
cris.boxmetadata.label.scopusidentifier
2-s2.0-84881369900
cris.boxmetadata.label.pubmedidentifier
cris.boxmetadata.label.source
Animal Reproduction Science
cris.boxmetadata.label.containerissn
03784320
cris.boxmetadata.label.sponsor
The authors thank Dr. Reuben Mapletoft and Dr. Jaswant Singh for their valuable help during the development of the techniques. They also thank Bioniche Animal Health Canada Inc. for providing Folltropin-V, Duratropin, Pregnecol, and Lutropin-V. This study was supported by grants from the Advancing Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food Fund (ACAAF) , the Canada-Saskatchewan Agri-Food Innovation Fund (AFIF) , Parks Canada , the World Wildlife Fund , and the Government of The Northwest Territories .
peru-layout.shadow-copies
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus