Title
How do clinicians prefer cultural competence training? Findings from the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview field trial
Date Issued
01 August 2016
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Aggarwal N.K.
Lam P.
Castillo E.G.
Weiss M.G.
Diaz E.
Van Dijk R.
Rohlof H.
Ndetei D.M.
Scalco M.
Aguilar-Gaxiola S.
Bassiri K.
Deshpande S.
Groen S.
Jadhav S.
Kirmayer L.J.
Paralikar V.
Westermeyer J.
Santos F.
Anez L.
Boiler M.
Nicasio A.V.
Lewis-Fernández R.
Publisher(s)
Springer New York LLC
Abstract
Objective: This study's objective is to analyze training methods clinicians reported as most and least helpful during the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview field trial, reasons why, and associations between demographic characteristics and method preferences. Method: The authors used mixed methods to analyze interviews from 75 clinicians in five continents on their training preferences after a standardized training session and clinicians' first administration of the Cultural Formulation Interview. Content analysis identified most and least helpful educational methods by reason. Bivariate and logistic regression analysis compared clinician characteristics to method preferences. Results: Most frequently, clinicians named case-based behavioral simulations as "most helpful" and video as "least helpful" training methods. Bivariate and logistic regression models, first unadjusted and then clustered by country, found that each additional year of a clinician's age was associated with a preference for behavioral simulations: OR = 1.05 (95 % CI: 1.01-1.10; p = 0.025). Conclusions: Most clinicians preferred active behavioral simulations in cultural competence training, and this effect was most pronounced among older clinicians. Effective training may be best accomplished through a combination of reviewing written guidelines, video demonstration, and behavioral simulations. Future work can examine the impact of clinician training satisfaction on patient symptoms and quality of life.
Start page
584
End page
591
Volume
40
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Psiquiatría Educación general (incluye capacitación, pedadogía)
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84978127544
PubMed ID
Source
Academic Psychiatry
ISSN of the container
10429670
Sponsor(s)
The study was supported by a grant from the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to the DSM-5 Cross-Cultural Issues Subgroup. The APA played no role in subject enrollment, data analysis, manuscript development, or presentation of results. Drs. Aggarwal, Kirmayer, and Lewis-Fernández receive royalties as editors of a book on the Cultural Formulation Interview published through American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. No other author has any conflict of interest to declare.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus