Title
Value chains to improve diets: Diagnostics to support intervention design in Malawi
Date Issued
01 June 2020
Access level
open access
Resource Type
editorial
Author(s)
Gelli A.
Margolies A.
Aberman N.
Santacroce M.
Chirwa E.
Henson S.
Hawkes C.
Publisher(s)
Elsevier B.V.
Abstract
Governments and development partners looking to accelerate progress in addressing malnutrition have been examining how to use interventions in value-chains to improve diets. However, the links between interventions in value chains and diets involve a range of direct and indirect effects that are not yet well understood. We apply a mixed-method multisectoral diagnostic to examine potential interventions in food systems to improve diets of smallholder farmers in Malawi. We examine entry points for interventions involving public and private-sectors, and explore the methodological requirements for undertaking this type of multisectoral analysis. We find that although food consumption is dominated by maize, a range of nutritious foods are also being consumed; including leafy greens, fruits, chicken, dried fish, dried beans and peas, and groundnuts. Yet important deficits in nutrient intake remain prevalent in low-income households due to inadequate quantity of consumption. While increasing consumption through own-production is one potentially important channel to increase quantity of nutritious foods available (particularly fruits and leafy green vegetables), markets also play a potentially important role. Nutritious foods are available on markets year-round, although strong seasonality impacts the availability and price of perishable products. For beans, peas and groundnuts, supply appears to be available throughout the year, with price fluctuations relatively controlled due to storage capacity and imports. The capacity of markets to supply safe and nutritious food is limited by a number of issues, including poor hygiene; lack of infrastructure for storage and selling; limited information on nutrition, and weak coordination among sellers and producers. Other bottlenecks include: on-farm constraints for expanded production, consumers with limited purchasing capacity, intense competition among sellers and few services for sellers to increase volume of product sold during peak demand. The diagnostics identify the role of information-related interventions to optimize decisions related to food choices, involving a range of different foods and value-chains, that could potentially lead to short- and medium-term improvements in diets. Longer-term and more resource-intensive interventions are also identified, such as improving capacity for product differentiation, processing, storage, and market infrastructure across a different range of food chains, so as to maximise coherence between short- and long-term planning. The findings highlight the benefits of applying a strategic, food systems-based approach of identifying specific and complementary actions for both the public and private sectors that can improve the diets of low-income populations.
Volume
25
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Nutrición, Dietética
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85073027395
Source
Global Food Security
ISSN of the container
22119124
Sponsor(s)
We acknowledge support from the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health , led by IFPRI. This work was supported by the Nutrition Embedding Evaluation Program grant from PATH and the Innovative Methods and Metrics for Agriculture and Nutrition grant, both of which are funded by the UK government's Department for International Development . The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government's official policies. This work was supported by (1) the Innovative Methods and Metrics for Agriculture and Nutrition grant; (2) the Nutrition Embedding Evaluation Program grant from PATH (both funded by the UK government's Department for International Development ); and (3) CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health , led by IFPRI. This work was supported by (1) the Innovative Methods and Metrics for Agriculture and Nutrition grant; (2) the Nutrition Embedding Evaluation Program grant from PATH (both funded by the UK government's Department for International Development); and (3) CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health, led by IFPRI.This study was implemented in a partnership between IFPRI, WFP, Save the Children, Wadonda and Chancellor College, and University of Malawi. We would like to thank the following experts for input and feedback on the study:, At IFPRI: Dan Gilligan, Shalini Roy, Melissa Hidrobo, Olivier Ecker, Todd Benson, and Marie Ruel. At Save the Children: Aisha Twalibu, George Chidalwenga, Natalie Roschik, Peter Phiri, Lexon Ndalama, and Matthew Pickard. At WFP: Nancy Aburto, David Ryckembusch, Daniel Longhurst, and Mutinta Hambayi, We acknowledge support from the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health, led by IFPRI. This work was supported by the Nutrition Embedding Evaluation Program grant from PATH and the Innovative Methods and Metrics for Agriculture and Nutrition grant, both of which are funded by the UK government's Department for International Development. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government's official policies.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus