Title
Healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature review
Date Issued
01 June 2020
Access level
open access
Resource Type
review
Author(s)
Niño de Guzmán E.
Song Y.
Alonso-Coello P.
Neamtiu L.
Parmelli E.
Pérez-Bracchiglione J.
Rabassa M.
Rigau D.
Parkinson Z.S.
Solà I.
Vásquez-Mejía A.
Ricci-Cabello I.
Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau
Publisher(s)
Springer
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical guidelines’ (CGs) adherence supports high-quality care. However, healthcare providers do not always comply with CGs recommendations. This systematic literature review aims to assess the extent of healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe and to identify the factors that impact on healthcare providers’ adherence. Methods: We searched for systematic reviews and quantitative or qualitative primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase up to May 2019. The eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and cross-checked by a second author. We conducted a narrative synthesis attending to the modality of the healthcare process, methods to measure adherence, the scope of the CGs, and population characteristics. Results: Out of 8137 references, we included 41 primary studies conducted in eight European countries. Most followed a retrospective cohort design (19/41; 46%) and were at low or moderate risk of bias. Adherence for overall breast cancer care process (from diagnosis to follow-up) ranged from 54 to 69%; for overall treatment process [including surgery, chemotherapy (CT), endocrine therapy (ET), and radiotherapy (RT)] the median adherence was 57.5% (interquartile range (IQR) 38.8–67.3%), while for systemic therapy (CT and ET) it was 76% (IQR 68–77%). The median adherence for the processes assessed individually was higher, ranging from 74% (IQR 10–80%), for the follow-up, to 90% (IQR 87–92.5%) for ET. Internal factors that potentially impact on healthcare providers’ adherence were their perceptions, preferences, lack of knowledge, or intentional decisions. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of breast cancer patients are not receiving CGs-recommended care. Healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe has room for improvement in almost all care processes. CGs development and implementation processes should address the main factors that influence healthcare providers' adherence, especially patient-related ones. Registration:: PROSPERO (CRD42018092884).
Start page
499
End page
518
Volume
181
Issue
3
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Oncología
Políticas de salud, Servicios de salud
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85084677143
PubMed ID
Source
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
ISSN of the container
01676806
Sponsor(s)
The systematic review was carried out by the Iberoamerican Cochrane Center under Framework Contract 443094 for procurement of services between European Commission Joint Research Centre and Asociación Colaboración Cochrane Iberoamericana. YS is funded by China Scholarship Council (No. 201707040103). MR is funded by Sara Borrell contract (CD16/00157). AVM received a training Grant D43 TW007393 Fogarty International Centre of the US National Institutes of Health for the Emerging Diseases and Climate Change Research Unit of the School and Public Health Administration at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus