Title
Postoperative adjuvant lapatinib and concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance lapatinib monotherapy in high-risk patients with resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Date Issued
10 December 2015
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Harrington K.
Temam S.
Mehanna H.
D'Cruz A.
Jain M.
D'Onofrio I.
Manikhas G.
Horvath Z.
Sun Y.
Dietzsch S.
Dubinsky P.
Holeckova P.
El-Hariry I.
Franklin N.
Biswas-Baldwin N.
Legenne P.
Wissel P.
Netherway T.
Farrell J.
Ellis C.
Wang-Silvanto J.
Amonkar M.
Ahmed N.
Bourhis J.
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals
Publisher(s)
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Abstract
Purpose: This multicenter phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lapatinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB2 inhibitor, administered concomitantly with chemoradiotherapy and as maintenance monotherapy in patients with high-risk surgically treated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods: Patients with resected stage II to IVA SCCHN, with a surgical margin ≤ 5 mm and/or extracapsular extension, were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy (66 Gy total radiation dose and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 per day administered on days 1, 22, and 43) plus placebo or lapatinib (1,500 mg per day) before and during chemoradiotherapy, followed by 12 months of maintenance monotherapy. Results: Six hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled (lapatinib, n = 346; placebo, n = 342). With a median follow-up time of 35.3 months, the study ended early because of the apparent plateauing of disease-free survival (DFS) events. Median DFS assessed by an independent review committee was 53.6 months and not reached for lapatinib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.43). Investigator-assessed results confirmed the independent review committee assessment. No significant differences in DFS by human papillomavirus status or overall survival were observed between treatment arms. Similar numbers of patients in both treatment arms experienced adverse events (AEs), with more patients in the lapatinib arm than the placebo arm experiencing serious AEs (48% v 40%, respectively). The most commonly observed treatmentrelated AEs were diarrhea and rash, both predominantly in the lapatinib arm. Conclusion: Addition of lapatinib to chemoradiotherapy and its use as long-term maintenance therapy does not offer any efficacy benefits and had additional toxicity compared with placebo in patients with surgically treated high-risk SCCHN.
Start page
4202
End page
4209
Volume
33
Issue
35
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Oncología
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84957534749
PubMed ID
Source
Journal of Clinical Oncology
ISSN of the container
0732183X
Source funding
GlaxoSmithKline
Sponsor(s)
We thank all patients and their families, investigators, and study staff; the independent data monitoring committee; and the BioClinica (independent review committee), EqualEstro (Radiotherapy Quality Assurance), and PAREXEL(independent statistics) teams. The authors also thank Jen Carver, Jhangir Irani, Sejal Patel, Zuheb Ali, and all members of the GlaxoSmithKline central and monitoring team. Lapatinib is an asset of Novartis AG as of March 2, 2015. Editorial support was provided by Karen Yee, PhD, of Fishawack Indicia, funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus