Title
Should there be a clinical typology of posttraumatic stress disorder?
Date Issued
01 January 1997
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
review article
Author(s)
Deering C.G.
Glover S.G.
Ready D.J.
Eddleman H.C.
VA Medical Center
Abstract
Objective: The current classification of posttraumatic stress disorder in acute, chronic and delayed-onset types is incomplete and of limited usefulness. The present paper explores the possibilities of a clinically-based typology that would reflect both the patients' syndromic presentation and modern research findings. Method: Review of current clinical and research literature, with a critical examination of proposed typologies, parameters utilised, applicability and relevance; elaboration of theoretical and practical bases of a clinical typology of posttraumatic stress disorder. Results: None of the existing posttraumatic stress disorder typologies presents a clinically comprehensive scope. A typology supported by literature findings and clinical observations is proposed. The six clinical types are depressive, dissociative, somatomorphic, psychotomorphic, organomorphic and 'neurotic-like'. Substance abuse and personality disorder-like variants remain as areas of investigation. Conclusions: The proposed typology, while accepting the nuclear manifestations of posttraumatic stress disorder, highlights prominent coexisting symptoms that define the clinical appearance of different patients. The typological approach in posttraumatic stress disorder does not carry the ambiguities of comorbidity, and facilitates a more specific and appropriate management of the cases.
Start page
159
End page
167
Volume
31
Issue
2
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Psiquiatría
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-0030926438
PubMed ID
Source
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
ISSN of the container
00048674
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus