Title
Immunotherapy for porcine cysticercosis: Implications for prevention of human disease
Date Issued
01 January 1997
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Pilcher J.B.
Tsang V.C.W.
Alvarez M.
Castro M.
Fernando Diaz G.H.
Martinez M.
Miranda E.
Naranjo J.
Torres P.
Addenbrooke 's Hospital
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and Hygiene
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Publisher(s)
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Abstract
Taenia solium cysticercosis is an important cause of human disease in many developing countries, Porcine cysticercosis is a vital link in the transmission of this disease and impairs meat production. A treatment for porcine cysticercosis may be an effective way of preventing human disease that would also benefit pig farmers, facilitating control programs in disease-endemic regions. Previous research suggests that reinfection with cysticercosis or immunotherapy with cysticercal antigens may cause degeneration of cysticerci, potentially curing porcine cysticercosis. Therefore, a blinded, randomized, controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in 28 naturally parasitized pigs was performed. Four groups of pigs with similar weights were inoculated twice with membrane-enriched cysticercal antigens (MA), saline, aqueous-soluble crude cysticercal antigens (AA) in adjuvant (Freund's complete then incomplete), or adjuvant alone. Immunotherapy was well tolerated but had no consistent effect on the macroscopic appearance of cysticerci or eosinophil count. Histopathologic findings were variable, with both severe and minimal inflammatory reactions seen in adjacent cysticerci in all pigs. Nine (64%) of 14 pigs given immunotherapy developed new antibody bands on electroimmunotransfer blot compared with one (7%) of 14 control pigs (P < 0.01). Treatment with AA in adjuvant caused a significant increase in the proportion of cysticerci that failed to evaginate and were, therefore, not viable for infecting humans (34% for pigs given AA in adjuvant compared with 10% for adjuvant alone; P < 0.04). Although immunotherapy caused a statistically significant decrease in the viability of cysticerci, this immunologic reaction was not great enough to prevent human disease.
Start page
33
End page
37
Volume
56
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Enfermedades infecciosas
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-0031035403
PubMed ID
Source
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
ISSN of the container
00029637
Sponsor(s)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases / U01AI035894.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus