Title
Did earthquakes strike Machu Picchu?
Date Issued
01 August 2020
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Publisher(s)
Springer
Abstract
The Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (Cusco, Peru) is one of the most important archaeological monuments in Peru and worldwide. Machu Picchu is classified as a UNESCO World Heritage site and at risk from climatic change. However, the seismic centennial history of Peru reports large earthquakes generated both along the subduction zone (Mw8) and on active crustal faults along the Andean Cordillera (Mw7). It is therefore important to know if Machu Picchu is located in an area of seismic hazard and then to take measures to mitigate potential seismic hazards. Due to the short historical earthquake catalogue (< 500 years) and the absence of significant recent instrumental seismicity in the site’s vicinity (radius of < 30 km), our knowledge about the seismic hazard in Machu Picchu is limited. The earthquakes of 1650 and 1950 affected Cusco city and surrounding areas, but without damage descriptions in Machu Picchu (80 km away) (Silgado Ferro 1978). In this study, we make the first attempt to use the analysis of earthquake archaeological effects (EAEs) and their differentiation from the effects generated by slope movements (creep) to investigate the past occurrence of strong earthquakes at the site. The application of geological structural analysis to the deformations observed in Machu Picchu shows two directions of the mean ground movement: N020° E and N110° E. Two earthquakes that affected Machu Picchu during its construction generated these directions. This kind of data should be used in the future to protect this important archaeological site.
Start page
883
End page
895
Volume
24
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Geología
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85074789220
Source
Journal of Seismology
ISSN of the container
13834649
Sponsor(s)
This work was supported by the Peruvian Project “Cusco-PATA” (Convenio 006-2016 FONDECYT), IRD, and by the Spanish Civil Society Rodríguez-Perucha. Acknowledgements Acknowledgements to the National Archaeological Park of Machu Picchu (NAPM, Ministry of Culture. Cusco, Peru) for their kind and strong support during the fieldwork. We are especially grateful to Fernando Astete Victoria (director of NAPM), Piedad Champi Monterroso (archaeologist, NAMP), and Ruth Verónica Ttito Mamani (geologist, NAPM).
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Instituto Geológico Minero y Metalúrgico Scopus