Introduction: The correct teaching is an extremely important academic aspect, however in our media it has not been evaluated, unlike other countries that do have records. Objective: To determine the factors associated with dissatisfaction of the research carried out sixteen faculties of Peruvian medicine. Methodology: Analytical cross-sectional study of secondary data analysis, a survey self-applied was applied and was taken as dependent variable which respondents manifest that they were very dissatisfied and / or unhappy with the research done in its power, this was contrasted with other variables; It was obtained statistical association with generalized linear models. Results: 46.4 % (1369) said they were dissatisfied with their faculty research. They increased the frequency of dissatisfaction the greatest year of study (RPCs: 1.06; 95 % CI: 1.00 to 1.13: p value: 0.049), dissatisfaction with the university virtual library (RPCs: 1,12: IC95: 1.01 to 1.25, p value: 0.025), with support for search (RPCs: 1.16; 95 % CI: 1.04 to 1.30; p-value: 0.008), the agreements that have university (RPCs: 2.25; 95 % CI: 1.47 to 3.46; p value <0.001) and receiving instruction in general (RPC: 1.30; 95 % CI: 1.08 to 1.57; p value: 0.007), adjusted for sex, age, incentives for research, if your university has a research and dissatisfaction with the knowledge of teachers and computer lab. Conclusion: The medical student is regularly satisfied with the performance of his teachers, varying according to the year of studies and the characteristics of the university. It is necessary for each institution to evaluate its reality, so that it can implement activities to improve the educational quality of future doctors in the country.