Title
A 5-week randomized clinical evaluation of a novel electric toothbrush head with regular and tapered bristles versus a manual toothbrush for reduction of gingivitis and plaque
Date Issued
01 May 2019
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Clinical Operations, Procter & Gamble
Publisher(s)
Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of an oscillating-rotating (O-R) electric rechargeable toothbrush with a novel round brush head comprised of regular and tapered bristles in reducing plaque and gingivitis versus a manual toothbrush. Methods: This was a randomized, examiner-blind, parallel group, five-week study. Participants with mild-to-moderate plaque and gingivitis received an oral examination and were evaluated for baseline plaque (Rustogi Modified Navy Index), gingivitis (Modified Gingival Index) and gingival bleeding (Gingival Bleeding Index). Qualifying participants were randomly assigned to the novel Oral-B sensitive brush head (EB60) on an Oral-B Vitality O-R handle (D12) or an ADA manual toothbrush. Participants brushed twice daily with the assigned brush and a standard fluoride dentifrice for 5 weeks before returning for an oral examination and plaque and gingivitis evaluations. Results: A total of 150 participants were randomized to treatment and completed the study (mean age = 45.7 years). Both brushes demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in number of bleeding sites versus baseline (P < 0.001). At Week 5, the number of bleeding sites was reduced from baseline by 11.15 (52.2%) for the O-R brush and 5.04 (23.6%) for the manual brush. The treatment difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Significant reductions versus baseline (P < 0.001) were also seen for both brushes for MGI, GBI and Rustogi plaque measures (whole mouth, gingival margin and proximal), but the O-R brush produced significantly greater reductions versus the manual brush (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The O-R handle and round brush head with tapered and regular bristles produced greater plaque and gingivitis reductions than the manual brush.
Start page
153
End page
160
Volume
17
Issue
2
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Odontología, Cirugía oral, Medicina oral
Ingeniería médica
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85058849732
PubMed ID
Source
International Journal of Dental Hygiene
ISSN of the container
16015029
Sponsor(s)
Funding information The study was funded by Procter & Gamble. This study was funded by Procter & Gamble and conducted by All Sum Research Center Ltd. Dr. Ccahuana-Vasquez, Dr. Adam, Ms. Conde, Dr. Grender and Ms. Cunningham are employees of Procter & Gamble. Dr. Goyal and Mr. Qaqish are employees of All Sum Research Center Ltd.
The study was funded by Procter & Gamble.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus