Title
Accuracy of a Laryngopharyngeal Endoscopic Esthesiometer (LPEER) for Evaluating Laryngopharyngeal Mechanosensitivity: A Validation Study in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort of Patients
Date Issued
01 February 2018
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Giraldo-Cadavid L.F.
Burguete J.
Rueda F.
Galvis A.M.
Castaneda N.
Balaguera J.I.
Paez N.
Fernandez S.
Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería
Publisher(s)
Springer New York LLC
Abstract
Recent studies have shown an association between alterations in laryngopharyngeal mechanosensitivity (LPMS) and dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, and chronic cough hypersensitivity syndrome. A previous reliability study of a new laryngopharyngeal endoscopic esthesiometer and rangefinder (LPEER) showed high intra- and inter-rater reliability; however, its accuracy has not been tested. We performed an accuracy study of the LPEER in a prospectively and consecutively recruited cohort of 118 patients at two tertiary care university hospitals. Most of the patients were suffering from dysphagia, and all of them underwent a standard clinical evaluation and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) using a new sensory testing protocol. The sensory test included determinations of the laryngeal adductor reflex threshold (LART), the cough reflex threshold (CRT) and the gag reflex threshold (GRT). Abnormalities on these reflex thresholds were evaluated for associations with major alterations in swallowing safety (pharyngeal residues, penetration, and aspiration). We evaluated the discriminative capacity of the LPMS test using ROC curves and the area under the curve (AUC–ROC) and its relationship with the eight-point penetration–aspiration scale (PAS) using the Spearman’s ρ correlation coefficient (SCC). We found a positive correlation between the PAS and LART (SCC 0.47; P < 0.001), CRT (SCC 0.46; P < 0.001) and GRT (SCC 0.34; P = 0.002). The AUC–ROC values for detecting a PAS ≥7 were as follows: LART, 0.83 (P < 0.0001); CRT, 0.79 (P < 0.0001); GRT, 0.72 (P < 0.0001). In this study, the LPEER showed good accuracy for evaluating LPMS. These results justify further validation studies in independent populations.
Start page
15
End page
25
Volume
33
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Medicina clínica
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85026919162
PubMed ID
Source
Dysphagia
ISSN of the container
0179051X
Sponsor(s)
Universidad de Navarra
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus