Title
Prolyl aminopeptidase gene from Flavobacterium meningosepticum: Cloning, purification of the expressed enzyme, and analysis of its sequence
Date Issued
01 December 1996
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
KITAZONO SUGAHARA, ANA AKEMI
Kabashima T.
Huang H.
Ito K.
Yoshimoto T.
Publisher(s)
Academic Press Inc.
Abstract
In spite of the numerous studies regarding prolyl aminopeptidase, little is known about its mechanism and the significance of its similarity to a number of hydrolases of diverse specificity that belong to the α/β hydrolase-fold family (Pseudomonas 2-hydroxymuconic semialdehyde hydrolase, atropinesterase, and 2-hydroxy-6-oxophenylhexa-2,4-dienoic acid hydrolase; human and rat epoxide hydrolases). We report the cloning and sequencing of the novel prolyl aminopeptidase gene from Flavobacterium meningosepticum (FPAP) which allowed a more comprehensive sequence comparison. FPAP was found to be a 35-kDa monomeric enzyme, releasing N-terminal proline but not hydroxyproline residues from small peptides and naphthylamide esters. Using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean method, an evolutionary tree that depicts the probable relationship between the prolyl aminopeptidases and the α/β hydrolase-fold enzymes was constructed. Since the α/β hydrolase-fold family might also include the members of the prolyl oligopeptidase family (prolyl oligopeptidase, dipeptidyl peptidase IV, and prolyl carboxypeptidase), this proposal links all the known Pro-Y bond- cleaving proline-specific peptidases (prolyl oligopeptidase family, prolyl aminopeptidases, and prolinase) as enzymes with similar scaffolds and hydrolytic mechanisms. On the other hand, the enzymes that cleave X-Pro bonds are metalloenzymes grouped within the 'pita-bread' fold family (aminopeptidase P and prolidase). Although the latter two enzymes show significant sequence homology, prolyl aminopeptidase, prolinase, and the members of the prolyl oligopeptidase family do not, and might share the α/β hydrolase-fold scaffold. This rationale would explain the failure in finding a common 'proline-recognizing motif' in the primary structures of these proline-specific peptidases.
Start page
35
End page
41
Volume
336
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Biología celular, Microbiología Bioquímica, Biología molecular
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-0030461347
PubMed ID
Source
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
ISSN of the container
00039861
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus