Title
Adverse Effects of Pharmacologic Treatments of Major Depression in Older Adults
Date Issued
01 January 2019
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Sobieraj D.M.
Martinez B.K.
Coleman C.I.
Ross J.S.
Berg K.M.
Steffens D.C.
Baker W.L.
University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy
Publisher(s)
Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess adverse effects of pharmacologic antidepressants for treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults 65 years of age or older. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Specialist or generalist outpatient setting, rehabilitation facility, and nursing facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Persons 65 years and older with MDD. INTERVENTION: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), bupropion, mirtazapine, trazodone, vilazodone, or vortioxetine compared with another antidepressant, placebo, or nonpharmacologic therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Adverse events, arrhythmias, cognitive impairment, falls, fractures, hospitalization, mortality, QTc prolongation, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events. RESULTS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials and two observational studies were included. Most studies evaluated treatment of the acute phase (<12 wk) of MDD of moderate severity. SSRIs led to a statistically similar frequency of overall adverse events vs placebo (moderate strength of evidence [SOE]), but SNRIs caused more overall adverse events vs placebo (high SOE) during the acute treatment phase. Both SSRIs and SNRIs led to more study withdrawals due to adverse events vs placebo (SSRIs low SOE; SNRIs moderate SOE). Duloxetine led to a more falls vs placebo (moderate SOE) during 24 weeks of acute and continuation treatment of MDD. CONCLUSION: In patients 65 years of age or older with MDD, treatment of the acute phase of MDD with SNRIs, but not SSRIs, was associated with a statistically greater number of overall adverse events vs placebo. SSRIs and SNRIs led to a greater number of study withdrawals due to adverse events vs placebo. Duloxetine increased the risk of falls that as an outcome was underreported in the literature. Few studies examined head-to-head comparisons, most trials were not powered to evaluate adverse events, and results of observational studies may be confounded. Comparative long-term studies reporting specific adverse events are needed to inform clinical decision making regarding choice of antidepressants in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1571–1581, 2019.
Start page
1571
End page
1581
Volume
67
Issue
8
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Geriatría, Gerontología Psiquiatría
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85066820024
PubMed ID
Source
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
ISSN of the container
0002-8614
Sponsor(s)
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the EPC librarian, Sharon Giovenale, for her contribution to the literature search and citation retrieval process. Funding Source: This systematic review was funded under contract HHSA290201500012I from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services. Conflicts of Interest: In the past 36 months, Dr. Ross received research support through Yale University from Medtronic, Inc. and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to develop methods for postmarket surveillance of medical devices (U01FD004585), from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop and maintain performance measures that are used for public reporting (HHSM-500-2013-13018I), and from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association to better understand medical technology evaluation, and he currently receives research support through Yale University from Johnson and Johnson to develop methods of clinical trial data sharing, from the Food and Drug Administration to establish Yale-Mayo Clinic Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) program (U01FD005938), from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS022882), from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01HS025164), and from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation to establish the Good Pharma Scorecard at Bioethics International and to establish the Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT) at Yale. Funding Source: This systematic review was funded under contract HHSA290201500012I from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus