Title
Diet and the evolution of digestion and renal function in phyllostomid bats
Date Issued
01 January 2001
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Schondube J.E.
Herrera-M L.G.
Martínez Del Rio C.
Publisher(s)
Elsevier GmbH
Abstract
Bat species in the monophyletic family Phyllostomidae feed on blood, insects, small vertebrates, nectar, fruit and complex omnivorous mixtures. We used nitrogen stable isotope ratios to characterize bat diets and adopted a phylogenetically informed approach to investigate the physiological changes that accompany evolutionary diet changes in phyllostomids. We found that nitrogen stable isotopes separated plant-eating from animal-eating species. The blood of the latter was enriched in 15N. A recent phylogenetic hypothesis suggests that with the possible exception of carnivory, which may have evolved twice, all diets evolved only once from insectivory. The shift from insectivory to nectarivory and frugivory was accompanied by increased intestinal sucrase and maltase activity, decreased trehalase activity, and reduced relative medullary thickness of kidneys. The shift from insectivory to sanguinivory and carnivory resulted in reduced trehalase activity. Vampire bats are the only known vertebrates that do not exhibit intestinal maltase activity. We argue that these physiological changes are adaptive responses to evolutionary diet shifts. © by Urban & Fischer Verlag.
Start page
59
End page
73
Volume
104
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Zoología, Ornitología, Entomología, ciencias biológicas del comportamiento
Ecología
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-23044527999
Source
Zoology
ISSN of the container
09442006
Sponsor(s)
This research was funded by research grants from CONACyT to LGHM. Keith A. Hobson from the Department of Biology University of Saskatchewan, Canada, conducted the stable isotope analysis. Daniel Estrada, Adriana Manzo, Germán Méndez and David Curiel helped to collect samples in the field. Melissa K. Schroer and Enriquena Bustamante helped to conduct enzyme assays. Eldon Braun lent us his imaging analysis system and provided renal guidance. Eldon Braun, Judith Bronstein, William Calder, Jon Losos, Wayne Maddison, Lucinda McDade, Todd McWhorter, Diane O’Brien and Matthias Starck read and criticized the manuscript. Their counsel may have prevented us from making fools of ourselves. JES was funded by a CONACyT doctoral scholarship (125663).
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus