cris.boxmetadata.label.title
Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of Bixa Orellana in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated to benign prostatic hyperplasia
cris.boxmetadata.label.dateissued
01 browse.startsWith.months.january 2007
cris.boxmetadata.label.accesslevel
open access
cris.boxmetadata.label.resourcetype
journal article
cris.boxmetadata.label.authors
Zegarra Montes L.
VAISBERG WOLACH, ABRAHAM JAIME
Ioza C.
Aguirre R.L.
Talla O.
VILLEGAS VILCHEZ, LEON FAUSTINO
cris.boxmetadata.label.publisher
Brazilian Society of Urology
cris.boxmetadata.label.abstract
Objective: To determine the efficacy of Bixa Orellana (BO) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) presenting moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Materials and Methods: It is a prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. One thousand four hundred and seventy eight patients presenting moderate LUTS associated to BPH were interviewed, from whom we selected 136 to fulfill the criteria of inclusion and exclusion. Assignation was performed at random in blocks of four to receive B0 at a dose of 250 mg 3 times a day or placebo (Pbo) for 12 months, 68 patients were assigned to each group. From the patients in the study we obtained data of demographic, epidemiologic, symptom score, uroflowmetry and post void residual urine variables. Results: Basically both groups were compared clinically, demographically and biochemically. Throughout the study variations of symptom score, mean delta symptom score during each visit and the final average delta were similar for both groups (BO - 0.79 ± 1.87 and Pbo - 1.07 ± 1.49) (p = 0.33). Similarly variations of Qmax mean, Qmax average delta and final average delta were similar (BO 0.44 ± 1.07 and Pbo 0.47 ± 1.32) (p = 0.88). Variations of post void residual urine mean, post void residual urine average delta in each visit and the final average delta were similar for both groups (BO 4.24 ± 11.69 and Pbo 9.01 ± 18.66) (p = 0.07). No differences were found in the answers of clinically significant improvement assessed with relative risk and risk differences, even though the proportion of adverse effects was similar for both groups. Conclusion: Patients with BPH that present moderate LUTS did not show any benefit receiving BO when compared to placebo.
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationstartpage
493
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationendpage
501
cris.boxmetadata.label.volume
33
cris.boxmetadata.label.issue
4
cris.boxmetadata.label.language
English
cris.boxmetadata.label.ocdeknowledgeArea
Urología, Nefrología
cris.boxmetadata.label.subjects
cris.boxmetadata.label.doi
cris.boxmetadata.label.scopusidentifier
2-s2.0-34848837405
cris.boxmetadata.label.pubmedidentifier
cris.boxmetadata.label.source
International Braz J Urol
cris.boxmetadata.label.containerissn
16775538
peru-layout.shadow-copies
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus