Title
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
Date Issued
07 August 2009
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
May C.R.
Mair F.
Finch T.
MacFarlane A.
Dowrick C.
Treweek S.
Rapley T.
Ballini L.
Ong B.N.
Rogers A.
Murray E.
Elwyn G.
Légaré F.
Gunn J.
Mayo Clinic
Abstract
Background. Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. Methods. Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. Results. Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. Conclusion. Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing. © 2009 May et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Volume
4
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Salud pública, Salud ambiental
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-68049117093
Source
Implementation Science
ISSN of the container
17485908
Source funding
Economic and Social Research Council
Sponsor(s)
Procedural accounts of theory-building risk imposing an artificial order on processes that are highly contingent. Such processes are, in practice, very difficult to map. In this instance, the social relations and processes that have led to the development of NPT are complex, as are the research and policy problems and networks in which they are located. However, we can say that the processes of theoretical development described in this paper were opportunistic and organic in the beginning. However, after a formal Normalization Process Model [7] was developed and presented at seminars and conferences during 2005 and 2006, a multi-disciplinary group of researchers formed around the model and began to refine and develop it – and, most importantly, to apply it to specific research problems. After this group formed, theoretical development was undertaken more deliberately and strategically, with formal meetings in 2007 and 2008. After 2008, development of NPT was support by funding for meetings of a Peer Learning Set from the UK National Institute of Health Research, and by a 'follow-on' grant from the UK Economic and Social Research Council. Preparatory work for this paper was made possible by the award of a grant to EM and CRM of National Institutes for Health Research funding for a National School of Primary Care Research Peer Learning Set on the development of NPT. This group met in Edinburgh, Scotland, on 5 and 6 October 2008. Views presented in this paper are those of the authors and not of the UK Department of Health. We thank Dr Emma Fossey (Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary for Scotland), Catherine O'Donnell, Catherine Pope, Anne Kennedy, Stephanie Tooth, and Rob Wilson for their contributions to this meeting.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus