Title
Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19: A living systematic review
Date Issued
18 August 2020
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
review
Author(s)
Pasupuleti V.
White C.M.
University of Connecticut Health Outcomes
Publisher(s)
American College of Physicians
Abstract
Background: Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have antiviral effects in vitro against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Purpose: To summarize evidence about the benefits and harms of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the treatment or prophylaxis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Data Sources: PubMed (via MEDLINE), EMBASE (via Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv, Preprints, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry from 1 December 2019 until 8 May 2020. Study Selection: Studies in any language reporting efficacy or safety outcomes from hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine use in any setting in adults or children with suspected COVID-19 or at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data Extraction: Independent, dually performed data extraction and quality assessments. Data Synthesis: Four randomized controlled trials, 10 cohort studies, and 9 case series assessed treatment effects of the medications, but no studies evaluated prophylaxis. Evidence was conflicting and insufficient regarding the effect of hydroxychloroquine on such outcomes as all-cause mortality, progression to severe disease, clinical symptoms, and upper respiratory virologic clearance with antigen testing. Several studies found that patients receiving hydroxychloroquine developed a QTc interval of 500 ms or greater, but the proportion of patients with this finding varied among the studies. Two studies assessed the efficacy of chloroquine; 1 trial, which compared higher-dose (600 mg twice daily for 10 days) with lower-dose (450 mg twice daily on day 1 and once daily for 4 days) therapy, was stopped owing to concern that the higher dose therapy increased lethality and QTc interval prolongation. An observational study that compared adults with COVID-19 receiving chloroquine phosphate, 500 mg once or twice daily, with patients not receiving chloroquine found minor fever resolution and virologic clearance benefits with chloroquine. Limitation: There were few controlled studies, and control for confounding was inadequate in observational studies. Conclusion: Evidence on the benefits and harms of using hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine to treat COVID-19 is very weak and conflicting. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Start page
287
End page
297
Volume
173
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Epidemiología
Farmacología, Farmacia
DOI
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85089277945
PubMed ID
Source
Annals of Internal Medicine
ISSN of the container
00034819
Sponsor(s)
This study is based on research conducted by the University of Connecticut under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, Maryland (contract HHSA290-2015-00012I, task order 1). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents. The findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus