Title
Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in admissions and readmissions with and without syncope: A nationwide cohort study
Date Issued
01 January 2021
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Kadri A.N.
Zawit M.
Al-Adham R.
Hader I.
Nusairat L.
Almahmoud M.F.
Senussi M.
Altibi A.
Barakat A.
Masri A.
Publisher(s)
Oxford University Press
Abstract
Aims: The Pulmonary Embolism in Syncope Italian Trial reported 17.3% prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients admitted with syncope. We investigated the prevalence of venous thromboembolism [VTE, including PE and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)] in syncope vs. non-syncope admissions and readmissions, and if syncope is an independent predictor of VTE. Methods and results: We conducted an observational study of index admissions of the 2013-14 Nationwide Readmission Database. We excluded patients <18 years, December discharges, died during hospitalization, hospital transfers, and missing length of stay. Encounters were stratified by the presence or absence of DVT/PE and syncope diagnoses. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between syncope and VTE. There were 38 655 570 admissions, of whom 285 511 had syncope. In the overall cohort, syncope occurred in 1.6% of VTE and 1.8% in non-VTE admissions. In a multivariable model, syncope was associated with a lower prevalence of VTE [odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.78; P < 0.001]. In index syncope vs. non-syncope admissions, the prevalence of DVT, PE, and VTE were 0.4 ± 0.06% vs. 1.3 ± 0.12%, 0.2 ± 0.04% vs. 1.2 ± 0.11%, and 0.5 ± 0.07% vs. 2.1 ± 0.14% (all P < 0.001), respectively. At 30 days, the prevalence of DVT, PE, and VTE in syncope vs. non-syncope were 2.2 ± 0.14% vs. 2.1 ± 0.14% (P = 0.38), 1.4 ± 0.12% vs. 1.2 ± 0.11% (P = 0.01), and 2.6 ± 0.17% vs. 3.0 ± 0.17% (P = 0.99), respectively. Conclusion: Syncope admissions were associated with a lower prevalence of VTE as compared to non-syncope admissions. Syncope should not trigger an automatic PE workup, rather, should be put into context of patient presentation.
Start page
52
End page
58
Volume
7
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Medicina clínica
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85100445541
PubMed ID
Source
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
ISSN of the container
2058-5225
Sponsor(s)
This work was supported by a research training grant from the National Institute of Health [T32HL129964-02 to A.M.].
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus