Title
Comparison of hospital admission rates for psychiatric patients cared for by multidisciplinary outreach teams with and without peer specialist: A retrospective cohort study of Japanese Outreach Model Project 2011-2014
Date Issued
01 August 2018
Access level
open access
Resource Type
review
Author(s)
Kido Y.
Kawakami N.
Kayama M.
Publisher(s)
BMJ Publishing Group
Abstract
Objective This study examined whether having peer specialists (PS) in psychiatric multidisciplinary outreach teams was associated with a lower risk of hospitalisation, improved social functioning and decreased problem behaviours. Design and setting This study was a retrospective cohort study based on medical records. This study was conducted as a part of the Japanese Outreach Model Project 2011-2014, which provides services for persons diagnosed mainly as ICD-10 F0, F2 and F3, who have a high possibility of hospital admission/readmission with regular Japanese outpatient care. Participants A total of 292 participants (clients) from 31 multidisciplinary outreach teams with and without PS (n=108 and 184, respectively) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Outcome measures The primary outcome measure was hospitalisation during follow-up. The difference in hospitalisation during the follow-up between teams with and without PS was analysed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a Cox proportional hazards model. The secondary outcome measures were social functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning, GAF) and problem behaviours (Social Behaviour Schedule, SBS) of clients, and were assessed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Changes in social functioning and problem behaviours were compared between clients cared for by the two team types. Amount and content of the service were also compared. Results The clients cared by teams with PS had a significantly decreased probability of hospitalisation in Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR=0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89). The 6-month change in GAF or SBS was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion This is an observational study in which the presence of a PS appeared to be associated with a reduced rate of hospitalisation. A randomised study would be required to demonstrate a causal relationship.
Volume
8
Issue
8
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Psiquiatría Psicología
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85053138996
PubMed ID
Source
BMJ Open
ISSN of the container
20446055
Source funding
Comprehensive Research on Disability Health and Welfare of Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants of Japan
Sponsor(s)
Funding This study was part of a project supported by a grant from Comprehensive Research on Disability Health and Welfare of Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants of Japan (2011–2013). Competing interests None declared. Patient consent Obtained.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus