Title
Prevalence of Pragmatically Defined High CV Risk and its Correlates in LMIC A Report from 10 LMIC Areas in Africa, Asia, and South America
Date Issued
01 March 2016
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Li X.
Cui C.
Xu X.
Ali M.
Alam D.S.
Gaziano T.A.
Gupta R.
Irazola V.
Levitt N.S.
Prabhakaran D.
Rubinstein A.
Steyn K.
Tandon N.
Xavier D.
Wu Y.
Yan L.L.
Publisher(s)
Elsevier B.V.
Abstract
Background Currently available tools for assessing high cardiovascular risk (HCR) often require measurements not available in resource-limited settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). There is a need to assess HCR using a pragmatic evidence-based approach. Objectives This study sought to report the prevalence of HCR in 10 LMIC areas in Africa, Asia, and South America and to investigate the profiles and correlates of HCR. Methods Cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute - UnitedHealth Group Centers of Excellence. HCR was defined as history of heart disease/heart attack, history of stroke, older age (≥50 years for men and ≥60 for women) with history of diabetes, or older age with systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg. Prevalence estimates were standardized to the World Health Organization's World Standard Population. Results A total of 37,067 subjects ages ≥35 years were included; 53.7% were women and mean age was 53.5 ± 12.1 years. The overall age-standardized prevalence of HCR was 15.4% (95% confidence interval: 15.0% to 15.7%), ranging from 8.3% (India, Bangalore) to 23.4% (Bangladesh). Among men, the prevalence was 1.7% for the younger age group (35 to 49 years) and 29.1% for the older group (≥50); among women, 3.8% for the younger group (35 to 59 years) and 40.7% for the older group (≥60). Among the older group, measured systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg (with or without other conditions) was the most common criterion for having HCR, followed by diabetes. The proportion of having met more than 1 criterion was nearly 20%. Age, education, and body mass index were significantly associated with HCR. Cross-site differences existed and were attenuated after adjusting for age, sex, education, smoking, and body mass index. Conclusions The prevalence of HCR in 10 LMIC areas was generally high. This study provides a starting point to define targeted populations that may benefit from interventions combining both primary and secondary prevention strategies.
Start page
27
End page
36
Volume
11
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Sistema cardiaco, Sistema cardiovascular
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84963831395
PubMed ID
Source
Global Heart
ISSN of the container
22118160
Sponsor(s)
Individual studies with the exception of South Africa were funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract numbers HHSN268200900029C (Argentina), HHSN26820900032C (Bangladesh), HHSN268200900027C (China), HHSN268200900025C (India, Bangalore), HHSN268200900026C (India, New Delhi), and HHSN268200900033C (Peru).
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus