Title
Correspondence between scientific and traditional ecological knowledge: Rain forest classification by the non-indigenous ribereños in Peruvian Amazonia
Date Issued
01 June 2007
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Halme K.J.
University of Kent
Abstract
Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is a potential source of ecological information. Typically TEK has been documented at the species level, but habitat data would be equally valuable for conservation applications. We compared the TEK forest type classification of ribereños, the non-indigenous rural peasantry of Peruvian Amazonia, to a floristic classification produced using systematically collected botanical data. Indicator species analysis of pteridophytes in 300 plots detected two forest types on non-flooded tierra firme, each associated with distinct soil texture and fertility, and one forest type in areas subject to flooding. Nine TEK forest types were represented in the same set of plots. Each TEK forest type was consistently (>82%) associated with one of the three floristic classes and there were also clear parallels in the ecological characterizations of the forest types. Ribereños demonstrated clear preferences for certain forest types when selecting sites for slash-and-burn agriculture and hunting. Our results indicate that the non-tribal inhabitants of Amazonia possess valuable TEK that could be used in biodiversity inventories and wildlife management and conservation for characterizing primary rain forest habitats in Amazonia. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Start page
1785
End page
1801
Volume
16
Issue
6
OCDE Knowledge area
Conservación de la Biodiversidad
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-34249654689
Source
Biodiversity and Conservation
Resource of which it is part
Biodiversity and Conservation
ISSN of the container
09603115
DOI of the container
10.1007/s10531-006-9071-4
Sponsor(s)
Acknowledgements We are indebted to Gilberto Asipali; Jorge Pacaya and the inhabitants of Nueva Esperanza for sharing their knowledge with us. Hanna Tuomisto and Kalle Ruokolainen made valuable comments to the manuscript. K.H. is grateful to Helsingin Sanomain 100-vuotissäätiö, Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth’s Foundation and the Academy of Finland (through grants to H. Tuomisto and K. Ruokolainen) for financial support. Field work was conducted as part of R.B.’s wildlife conservation program funded by the Wildlife Conservation Society
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus