Title
Ecological consequences of hunting in Atlantic forest patches, São Paulo, Brazil
Date Issued
01 January 2001
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Cullen L.
Valladares-Padua C.
Abstract
This paper evaluates the ecological consequences of hunting by comparing mammalian densities, biomass, relative energy consumption and community structure between sites with different levels of hunting pressure. Hunting is carried out mainly by colonists who farm on the edge of Atlantic forest fragments in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Mammals were studied over a period of 18 months, along 2287 km of line transects. Transects were distributed among two protected sites, one slightly hunted site and two heavily hunted sites. Tapirs, the two peccary species, brocket deer, armadillos and agoutis are preferred by hunters in the region. Primates are not hunted in the region. Hunting has affected community structure, with ungulates dominating mammalian biomass at protected sites and primates dominating at hunted sites. This has caused an ecological inversion in the hunted areas of the Atlantic forests. In Amazonian regions of the Neotropics hunting is more evenly distributed among primates, large rodents, and ungulates and has resulted in an opposite inversion, with hunted sites having lower primate biomass. Atlantic forests are very susceptible to the possible ecological imbalances induced by hunting by humans, and this must be considered for management and conservation programmes.
Start page
137
End page
144
Volume
35
Issue
2
OCDE Knowledge area
Conservación de la Biodiversidad
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-0035042215
Source
ORYX
Resource of which it is part
ORYX
ISSN of the container
00306053
DOI of the container
10.1046/j.1365-3008.2001.00163.x
Sponsor(s)
This study was funded by a collection of small grants including the Scott Neotropical Fund of Lincoln Park Zoological Society; the Tropical Conservation and Development Program (TCD) of University of Florida; the Tinker Foundation; the Biodiversity Support Program, a consortium between US AID, World Wildlife Fund/US, The Nature Conservancy, and the World Resources Institute; The Conservation, Food and Health Foundation; the Programa Natureza e Sociedade World Wildlife Fund - Brazil; Fauna and Flora International's 100 per cent Fund; Duratex Company; and the Smithsonian Institution/US. Institutional support was provided by IPE - Instituto de Pesquisas Ecologicas and the Instituto Florestal de Sao Paulo, IF-SMA.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus