cris.boxmetadata.label.title
Interobserver Agreement Between Pathologists Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in Breast Cancer Using Methodology Proposed by the International TILs Working Group
cris.boxmetadata.label.dateissued
01 browse.startsWith.months.july 2016
cris.boxmetadata.label.accesslevel
metadata only access
cris.boxmetadata.label.resourcetype
journal article
cris.boxmetadata.label.authors
Swisher S.
Wu Y.
CASTAÑEDA ALTAMIRANO, CARLOS ARTURO
Lyons G.
Yang F.
Tapia C.
Wang X.
Bassett R.
CASAVILCA ZAMBRANO, SANDRO ANGEL ANIBAL
CASTILLO GARCIA, MILUSKA
Sahin A.
Mittendorf E.
cris.boxmetadata.label.publisher
Springer New York LLC
cris.boxmetadata.label.abstract
Background: The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast tumors is prognostic and predictive, suggesting that TILs may be an important biomarker. Recently, an international TILs working group formulated consensus recommendations for TIL evaluation. The current study was performed to determine interobserver agreement using that methodology. Methods: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were assessed on a single hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide obtained from the core biopsy of 75 triple-negative breast cancers. Four pathologists independently reviewed each slide and evaluated stromal TILs (sTILs) and intratumoral TIL (iTILs). The kappa statistic was used to estimate interobserver agreement for identification of sTILs, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the agreement among observers for iTILs. Cases with poor agreement were reviewed to identify pathologic factors that may contribute to the lack of agreement. Results: The kappa statistic for sTIL evaluation was 0.57 (standard error, 0.04). For iTILs, the ICC calculated to determine internal consistency within raters was 0.65 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.56–0.74; p < 0.0001), and the ICC calculated to determine agreement among raters was 0.62 (95 % CI 0.50–0.72; p < 0.0001). In 10 cases (13 %), there was not agreement between three of four pathologists. The pathologic features contributing to difficulty in TIL enumeration included marked individual tumor cell necrosis or apoptosis, the presence of reactive plasma cells mimicking tumor cells, plasmatoid tumor cells, and accurate quantification of TILs in specimens with focal areas of heavy immune infiltrate. Conclusion: Acceptable agreement in TIL enumeration was observed, suggesting that the proposed methodology can be used to facilitate the use of TILs as a biomarker in research and clinical trial settings.
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationstartpage
2242
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationendpage
2248
cris.boxmetadata.label.volume
23
cris.boxmetadata.label.issue
7
cris.boxmetadata.label.language
English
cris.boxmetadata.label.ocdeknowledgeArea
Oncología
cris.boxmetadata.label.subjects
cris.boxmetadata.label.doi
cris.boxmetadata.label.scopusidentifier
2-s2.0-84960464407
cris.boxmetadata.label.pubmedidentifier
cris.boxmetadata.label.source
Annals of Surgical Oncology
cris.boxmetadata.label.containerissn
10689265
cris.boxmetadata.label.sponsor
National Cancer Institute/P30CA016672
peru-layout.shadow-copies
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus