Title
Population genetics and process of domestication of Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley, México
Date Issued
01 January 2008
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
research article
Author(s)
Pérez-Nasser N.
Lira R.
Pérez-Salicrup D.
Casas A.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Abstract
Population genetics of wild, managed in situ and cultivated populations of Stenocereus pruinosus coexisting in Central Mexico were studied. We hypothesized that artificial selection decreases genetic diversity in managed populations and influences differentiation of populations depending on the amount of gene flow. Nine wild, managed in situ and cultivated populations (264 individual plants) were studied through isozyme analysis (10 loci). Genetic variation of S. pruinosus is the highest reported in columnar cacti species (e.g. HT=0.592). Genetic variation in cultivated populations (Ho=0.611, He=0.588) was slightly higher than in wild (Ho=0.556, He=0.583) and managed in situ populations (Ho=0.536, He=0.578), but differences were not significant. Most of the genetic variation occurred within populations, with low differentiation and high gene flow among all populations (FST=0.064, NmFST=3.659 and NmGST=3.803 in average) associated to bat pollination, seed dispersal by birds and transportation of vegetative propagules by people. Genetic distances were not correlated with geographic distances and in most cases are lower between similarly managed populations. Managed in situ and cultivated populations are important reservoirs of genetic diversity of this species to be considered in conservation programs. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Start page
1997
End page
2010
Volume
72
Issue
11
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ciencias del medio ambiente
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-50049120764
Source
Journal of Arid Environments
ISSN of the container
01401963
Sponsor(s)
The authors thank DGAPA, UNAM (research projects IN220005 and IN219608), SEMARNAT/CONACYT, Mexico (research project 2002-C01-0544), and Royal Gardens, Kew, for financial support, as well as Edgar Pérez-Negrón for field work assistance, people of the villages of the study area, who kindly allowed us to work in their land, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions to improve the manuscript.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus