Title
Knowledge management in Brazil: What governance mechanisms are needed to boost innovation?
Date Issued
01 December 2019
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Federal University of Santa Catarina
Publisher(s)
Cambridge University Press
Abstract
The need to innovate is relevant to many firms around the globe and is particularly pressing for those in emerging markets. They face global competition, are under-resourced, and suffer from weaker institutional support. It is suggested that to innovate successfully in this context, indigenous firms would benefit from focusing on managing their current knowledge base more efficiently. We know little about how knowledge management works outside developed economies and which knowledge governance mechanisms have more influence than others in the context of emerging economies. To address this gap, we explore how context may matter for the use of knowledge governance mechanisms and their effect on innovation performance in Brazilian firms. Using the survey data of 109 firms, structural equation modelling, and cluster analysis, our findings suggest that the joint application of knowledge-focused rewards, organizational design, and information and communication technologies that support knowledge processes is critical for boosting innovation performance. We discuss how the peculiarities of the Brazilian context may shape these findings. Our article contributes to the knowledge management and innovation literature by demonstrating that the joint effects of bundles of knowledge governance mechanisms and contextual variables should be explored in order to understand their impact on organizational outcomes.
Start page
857
End page
886
Volume
15
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Informática y Ciencias de la Información
Economía, Negocios
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85076706318
Source
Management and Organization Review
ISSN of the container
17408776
Sponsor(s)
We would like to thank the Industry Federation of Santa Catarina (FIESC) for supporting data collection, and CAPES – Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (PNPD program) for the financial support of the first author. We also greatly appreciate the constructive feedback given on previous drafts of this paper by Management and Organization Review editors Gerald McDermott and Arie Lewin, as well as anonymous reviewers. [1] Significance levels here and further in the comparison between clusters refer to the Tamhane's T2 test. Games-Howell test indicated similar results.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus