Title
Revisiting florivory: an integrative review and global patterns of a neglected interaction
Date Issued
01 January 2022
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Boaventura M.G.
Villamil N.
Teixido A.L.
Vasconcelos H.L.
Silveira F.A.O.
Cornelissen T.
Publisher(s)
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Abstract
Florivory is an ancient interaction which has rarely been quantified due to a lack of standardized protocols, thus impairing biogeographical and phylogenetic comparisons. We created a global, continuously updated, open-access database comprising 180 species and 64 families to compare floral damage between tropical and temperate plants, to examine the effects of plant traits on floral damage, and to explore the eco-evolutionary dynamics of flower–florivore interactions. Flower damage is widespread across angiosperms, but was two-fold higher in tropical vs temperate species, suggesting stronger fitness impacts in the tropics. Flowers were mostly damaged by chewers, but neither flower color nor symmetry explained differences in florivory. Herbivory and florivory levels were positively correlated within species, even though the richness of the florivore community does not affect florivory levels. We show that florivory impacts plant fitness via multiple pathways and that ignoring this interaction makes it more difficult to obtain a broad understanding of the ecology and evolution of angiosperms. Finally, we propose a standardized protocol for florivory measurements, and identify key research avenues that will help fill persistent knowledge gaps. Florivory is expected to be a central research topic in an epoch characterized by widespread decreases in insect populations that comprise both pollinators and florivores.
Start page
132
End page
144
Volume
233
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ecología
Ciencias de las plantas, Botánica
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85113672606
PubMed ID
Source
New Phytologist
ISSN of the container
0028646X
Sponsor(s)
We thank UFMG, UFSJ, CSEC, PPG-ECMVS and CAPES (Financial code 001) for continuous support. TC and FAOS received grants from CNPq (313007/2020-9) and FAPEMIG. We thank D. Negreiros for assistance with Fig. 1, and B. Soares for assistance with PGLS analyses. Data collection by NV was funded by a Davis Trust, Edinburgh University research grant. This study was partially financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their excellent comments, which significantly improved the manuscript.
We thank UFMG, UFSJ, CSEC, PPG‐ECMVS and CAPES (Financial code 001) for continuous support. TC and FAOS received grants from CNPq (313007/2020‐9) and FAPEMIG. We thank D. Negreiros for assistance with Fig. 1 , and B. Soares for assistance with PGLS analyses. Data collection by NV was funded by a Davis Trust, Edinburgh University research grant. This study was partially financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their excellent comments, which significantly improved the manuscript.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus