Title
Variation in stem mortality rates determines patterns of above-ground biomass in Amazonian forests: implications for dynamic global vegetation models
Date Issued
01 December 2016
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Johnson M.O.
Galbraith D.
Gloor M.
De Deurwaerder H.
Guimberteau M.
Rammig A.
Thonicke K.
Verbeeck H.
von Randow C.
Phillips O.L.
Brienen R.J.W.
Feldpausch T.R.
Lopez Gonzalez G.
Fauset S.
Quesada C.A.
Christoffersen B.
Ciais P.
Sampaio G.
Kruijt B.
Meir P.
Moorcroft P.
Zhang K.
Alvarez-Davila E.
Alves de Oliveira A.
Amaral I.
Andrade A.
Aragao L.E.O.C.
Araujo-Murakami A.
Arets E.J.M.M.
Arroyo L.
Aymard G.A.
Baraloto C.
Barroso J.
Bonal D.
Boot R.
Camargo J.
Chave J.
Cogollo A.
Lola da Costa A.C.
Di Fiore A.
Ferreira L.
Higuchi N.
Killeen T.J.
Laurance S.G.
Laurance W.F.
Licona J.
Lovejoy T.
Malhi Y.
Marimon B.
Marimon B.H.
Matos D.C.L.
Mendoza C.
Neill D.A.
Pardo G.
Peña-Claros M.
Pitman N.C.A.
Poorter L.
Prieto A.
Ramirez-Angulo H.
Roopsind A.
Rudas A.
Salomao R.P.
Silveira M.
Stropp J.
ter Steege H.
Terborgh J.
Thomas R.
Toledo M.
Torres-Lezama A.
van der Heijden G.M.F.
Vasquez R.
Guimarães Vieira I.C.
Vilanova E.
Vos V.A.
Baker T.R.
Andes to Amazon Biodiversity Program
Publisher(s)
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract
Understanding the processes that determine above-ground biomass (AGB) in Amazonian forests is important for predicting the sensitivity of these ecosystems to environmental change and for designing and evaluating dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). AGB is determined by inputs from woody productivity [woody net primary productivity (NPP)] and the rate at which carbon is lost through tree mortality. Here, we test whether two direct metrics of tree mortality (the absolute rate of woody biomass loss and the rate of stem mortality) and/or woody NPP, control variation in AGB among 167 plots in intact forest across Amazonia. We then compare these relationships and the observed variation in AGB and woody NPP with the predictions of four DGVMs. The observations show that stem mortality rates, rather than absolute rates of woody biomass loss, are the most important predictor of AGB, which is consistent with the importance of stand size structure for determining spatial variation in AGB. The relationship between stem mortality rates and AGB varies among different regions of Amazonia, indicating that variation in wood density and height/diameter relationships also influences AGB. In contrast to previous findings, we find that woody NPP is not correlated with stem mortality rates and is weakly positively correlated with AGB. Across the four models, basin-wide average AGB is similar to the mean of the observations. However, the models consistently overestimate woody NPP and poorly represent the spatial patterns of both AGB and woody NPP estimated using plot data. In marked contrast to the observations, DGVMs typically show strong positive relationships between woody NPP and AGB. Resolving these differences will require incorporating forest size structure, mechanistic models of stem mortality and variation in functional composition in DGVMs.
Start page
3996
End page
4013
Volume
22
Issue
12
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Forestal
Ecología
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84971419915
PubMed ID
Source
Global Change Biology
ISSN of the container
13541013
Sponsor(s)
This paper is a product of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme AMAZALERT project (282664). The field data used in this study have been generated by the RAINFOR network, which has been supported by a Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation grant, the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme projects 283080, ‘GEOCARBON’; and 282664, ‘AMAZALERT’; ERC grant ‘Tropical Forests in the Changing Earth System’), and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Urgency, Consortium and Standard Grants ‘AMAZONICA’ (NE/F005806/1), ‘TROBIT’ (NE/D005590/1) and ‘Niche Evolution of South American Trees’ (NE/I028122/1). Additional data were included from the Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) Network – a collaboration between Conservation International, the Missouri Botanical Garden, the Smithsonian Institution and the Wildlife Conservation Society, and partly funded by these institutions, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and other donors. Fieldwork was also partially supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico of Brazil (CNPq), project Programa de Pesquisas Ecológicas de Longa Duração (PELD-403725/2012-7). A.R. acknowledges funding from the Helmholtz Alliance ‘Remote Sensing and Earth System Dynamics’; L.P., M.P.C. E.A. and M.T. are partially funded by the EU FP7 project ‘ROBIN’ (283093), with co-funding for E.A. from the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (KB-14-003-030); B.C. [was supported in part by the US DOE (BER) NGEE-Tropics project (subcontract to LANL). O.L.P. is supported by an ERC Advanced Grant and is a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award holder. P.M. acknowledges support from ARC grant FT110100457 and NERC grants NE/J011002/1, and T.R.B. acknowledges support from a Leverhulme Trust Research Fellowship.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus