Title
Diagnostic accuracy of thyroid nodule growth to predict malignancy in thyroid nodules with benign cytology: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Date Issued
01 July 2016
Access level
open access
Resource Type
review
Author(s)
Singh Ospina N.
Maraka S.
Espinosa Deycaza A.
O'Keeffe D.
Brito J.
Gionfriddo M.
Castro M.
Morris J.
Erwin P.
Mayo Clinic
Publisher(s)
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract
Background Thyroid ultrasound to assess for nodular growth is commonly performed during the follow-up of patients with benign thyroid nodules, with the goal of identifying patients with a missed diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The objective of this study was to summarize the evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of growth during follow-up of benign thyroid nodules for thyroid cancer. Methods We searched multiple electronic databases using a search strategy designed by an experienced medical librarian from inception to March 2015. Eligible studies included patients with benign thyroid nodules assessed for growth during follow-up and evaluated for thyroid cancer either by surgical histology or a repeat fine needle aspiration biopsy. Reviewers working independently and in duplicate recorded data and assessed each study. Results The seven eligible studies lacked safeguards against bias and generated results that were imprecise with wide confidence intervals and inconsistent across studies. This warrants very low confidence in these results. The odds of nodule growth in patients with thyroid cancer on histopathology over these odds in patients without thyroid cancer (diagnostic odds ratio) was 0·58 (95% CI: 0·26-1·3); the diagnostic odds ratio was 2·2 (95% CI: 0·26-18) when an abnormal repeat biopsy was the reference standard. Conclusion The body of evidence linking nodule growth with thyroid cancer during the follow-up of benign nodules warrants very low confidence. In the era of high-value health care, the commonplace practice of following benign thyroid nodules with serial ultrasound assessment of growth to diagnose cancer can be questioned, calling for imminent evaluation.
Start page
122
End page
131
Volume
85
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Endocrinología, Metabolismo (incluyendo diabetes, hormonas)
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84956608927
PubMed ID
Source
Clinical Endocrinology
ISSN of the container
0300-0664
Sponsor(s)
MRG was supported by CTSA Grant Number TL1 TR000137 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This publication was made possible by CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus