Title
Participatory impact pathways analysis: A practical method for project planning and evaluation
Other title
Analyse participative des voies de l'impact: Une méthode pratique pour la planification et l'évaluation des projets
Date Issued
29 October 2010
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Alvarez S.
Douthwaite B.
Mackay R.
Córdoba D.
Tehelen K.
Social scientist at the International Potato Center
Abstract
Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) is a practical approach to planning, monitoring and evaluation, developed for use with complex research-for-development projects. PIPA begins with a participatory workshop where stakeholders make explicit their assumptions about how their project will make an impact, and produce an 'Outcomes logic model' and an 'Impact logic model'. These two logic models provide an ex-ante framework of predictions of impact that can also be used in priority setting and ex-post impact assessment. PIPA engages stakeholders in a structured participatory process, promoting learning and providing a framework for 'action research' on processes of change. © 2010 Taylor & Francis.
Start page
946
End page
958
Volume
20
Issue
8
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ciencias sociales
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-77958460150
Source
Development in Practice
ISSN of the container
09614524
Source funding
European Commission
Sponsor(s)
We wish particularly to thank the support from the Challenge Program on Water & Food, the EU-funded EULACIAS project, and the DFID-funded Andean Change Project. The first PIPA workshop was held in January 2006 in Ghana, with seven projects funded by the CGIAR2 Challenge Program on Water & Food (CPWF). By June 2009, nine PIPA workshops had been held for 46 projects in the CPWF, and 12 more for other projects. Researchers from the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), WorldFish Center, and the International Potato Center (CIP), together with two evaluation specialists,3 continue to develop PIPA. PIPA developed from work at CIAT on innovation histories (see Douthwaite and Ashby 2005) funded by the Institutional Learning and Change Initiative (ILAC). A paper describing the approach was published in the Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (Douthwaite et al. 2007a).
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus