Title
A randomized controlled study of socioeconomic support to enhance tuberculosis prevention and treatment, Peru
Other title
Une étude contrôlée randomisée de l’accompagnement socioéconomique pour améliorer la prévention et le traitement de la tuberculose au Pérou
Un estudio controlado aleatorizado de apoyo socioeconómico para mejorar la prevención y el tratamiento de la tuberculosis en Perú
Date Issued
01 April 2017
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Wingfield T.
Huff D.
Boccia D.
Saunders M.J.
Lewis J.J.
Imperial College London
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Imperial College London
Publisher(s)
World Health Organization
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of socioeconomic support on tuberculosis preventive therapy initiation in household contacts of tuberculosis patients and on treatment success in patients. Methods A non-blinded, household-randomized, controlled study was performed between February 2014 and June 2015 in 32 shanty towns in Peru. It included patients being treated for tuberculosis and their household contacts. Households were randomly assigned to either the standard of care provided by Peru’s national tuberculosis programme (control arm) or the same standard of care plus socioeconomic support (intervention arm). Socioeconomic support comprised conditional cash transfers up to 230 United States dollars per household, community meetings and household visits. Rates of tuberculosis preventive therapy initiation and treatment success (i.e. cure or treatment completion) were compared in intervention and control arms. Findings Overall, 282 of 312 (90%) households agreed to participate: 135 in the intervention arm and 147 in the control arm. There were 410 contacts younger than 20 years: 43% in the intervention arm initiated tuberculosis preventive therapy versus 25% in the control arm (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 2.2; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.1–4.1). An intention-to-treat analysis showed that treatment was successful in 64% (87/135) of patients in the intervention arm versus 53% (78/147) in the control arm (unadjusted OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0–2.6). These improvements were equitable, being independent of household poverty. Conclusion A tuberculosis-specific, socioeconomic support intervention increased uptake of tuberculosis preventive therapy and tuberculosis treatment success and is being evaluated in the Community Randomized Evaluation of a Socioeconomic Intervention to Prevent TB (CRESIPT) project.
Start page
270
End page
280
Volume
95
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Enfermedades infecciosas
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85016959906
PubMed ID
Source
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
ISSN of the container
00429686
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus